Results posted for 2015 SSPT Invitational

The meet results have been posted for the 2015 USA Powerlifting SSPT Invitational Powerlifting meet held at SSPT on 7-18-2015.

https://marylandpowerlifting.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/2015_sspt_invitational.pdf

Posted in Meets

Results available for the 2015 Baltimore Open

Meet Results are available for the USA Powerlifting Baltimore Powerlifting Open held on July 11, 2015.

https://marylandpowerlifting.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/2015_usa powerlifting_baltimore_open.pdf

 

Posted in Meets

Results available for 2015 Syke Out Classic

sykeoutclassic_smMeet results are now available for the 2015 USA Powerlifting Syke Out Classic Powerlifting meet that was held on May 30, 2015.

Results: https://marylandpowerlifting.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/2015_sykeout_meetresults1.pdf

 

 

Posted in Meets

Results for 2015 Equinox Open now available

Meet results are now available to the 2015 USA Powerlifting Equinox Open held at Top Tier on April 11th and 12th.

Direct link: https://marylandpowerlifting.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/2015_equinox_open.pdf

All Meet Results: https://marylandpowerlifting.com/meet-results

Meet results will be reviewed for any state records that may have been broken.  This is a manual review process that takes a little time.

Posted in Meets, News

Registration information for 2015 USA Powerlifting Baltimore Open

2015 USA POWERLIFTING BALTIMORE OPEN 

RAW FULL–LIFT ONLY – USA POWERLIFTING SANCTION #MD-2015-02

DATE:   SATURDAY  JULY 11, 2015

REGISTRATION: Registration is closed for this contest.  REGISTRATION WILL OPEN ON SUNDAY, APRIL 5TH AND WILL CLOSE WHEN WE REACH 50 LIFTERS.  IF YOU REGISTER TOO LATE, YOU CAN BE ADDED TO OUR WAITING LIST BY EMAILING THE MEET DIRECTOR YOUR FULL NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER. 

LOCATION:   EXILE FITNESS, 8101 PULASKI HIGHWAY, ROSEDALE, MD 21237.

HOTEL:  La Quinta Inn & Suites, 4 Philadelphia Ct, Baltimore, MD 21237, 410-574-8100

MEET DIRECTORBRIAN WASHINGTON, P.O. BOX 20042, BALTIMORE, MD 21284-0042,

443-804-9132; BRIAN@USBF.NET

ELIGIBILITY: ANY MALE OR FEMALE AGE 14 YEARS OR OLDER.  USA POWERLIFTING MEMBERSHIP: ALL LIFERS MUST HAVE A VALID USA POWERLIFTING MEMBERSHIP CARD, WHICH CAN BE UPDATED AND PURCHASED AT THE MEET. USA POWERLIFTING/IPF RULES WILL BE ENFORCED.  10% OF THE LIFTERS WILL BE DRUG TESTED.

RULES: http://www.usapowerlifting.com/aboutus/USAPLTechnicalRules20090800.pdf

ATTIRE: RAW: ALL LIFTERS MUST WEAR A NON-SUPPORTIVE SINGLET;

NON-SUPPORTIVE T-SHIRT AND SHOES MUST BE WORN IN EACH EVENT. NO KNEE WRAPS.  Raw lifters may only use the single ply knee sleeve during their lift, and it may not have any Velcro on it, must be both non-adjustable and non-fastening. LIFTERS ENTERING THE DEADLIFT MUST WEAR SHIN HIGH SOCKS COVERING UP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE KNEE. BELT AND WRIST WRAPS ARE ALLOWED.

ENTRY FEE: $80 FOR 1ST EVENT [& MEET SHIRT] AND $35.00 FOR ADDITIONAL EVENTS; SPECTATORS ARE FREE

                                      ABSOLUTELY NO REFUNDS FOR ANY REASON.

MEET SHIRTS: SHIRTS ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR ENTRY.  ADDITIONAL SHIRTS ARE AVAILABLE FOR $10.  AT THE MEET, T-SHIRTS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR $15.

 

 

AWARDS:  TOP 3; BEST FULL-LIFT FEMALE; BEST FULL-LIFT MALE; & BEST FULL-LIFT MASTER 50 & OVER.

 

SCHEDULE: Friday, JULY 10th:  CHECK-IN – RACK HEIGHTS / RELEASE / OPENING ATTEMPTS. This is optional and can be done on Saturday. 

Saturday, JULY 11th:  OFFICIAL WEIGH-IN BEGINS at 7:00 to 8:30 a.m.

RULES BRIEFING:  8:30 a.m.; LIFTING BEGINS at 9:00 a.m.

 

WEIGHT CLASSES:

MEN:   53.0Kg(116.8Lb) Jr & Sub-Jr Only; 59.0Kg(130.1Lb); 66.0Kg(145.5Lb); 74.0Kg(163.1Lb); 83.0Kg(183.0Lb); 93.0Kg(205.0Lb); 105.0Kg(231.5Lb); 120.0Kg(264.6Lb); 120.0+Kg(264.6+Lb)

 

WOMEN: 43.0Kg(94.8Lb) Jr & Sub-Jr Only; 47.0Kg(103.6Lb); 52.0Kg(114.6Lb); 57.0Kg(125.7Lb); 63.0Kg(138.9Lb); 72.0Kg(158.7Lb); 84.0Kg(185.2Lb); 84.0+Kg(185.2+Lb)

 

CATEGORIES OF COMPETITION:  OPEN

RAW FULL-LIFT:         ___OPEN    

RAW BENCH:               ___OPEN   [MUST BE IN THE FULL-LIFT TO DO THE RAW BENCH] 

RAW DEADLIFT:          ___OPEN   [MUST BE IN THE FULL-LIFT TO DO THE RAW BENCH] 

 

WHILE COMPETING ONLY IN THE OPEN, AGE GROUP STATE RECORDS CAN STILL BE ESTABLISHED.

ROSTER & FLIGHTS WILL BE POSTED TO THE USA POWERLIFTING MARYLAND WEBSITE.

Posted in Meets

2015 USA Powerlifting Syke Out Classic Roster and Flights

05/30/2015:  2015 USA Powerlifting Syke Out Classicsykeoutclassic (#MD-2015-04).

Athens Health Club – 6000 Emerald Ln Sykesville, MD 21784.

Registration is now closed.

Please see attached spreadsheet noting the full meet roster including lot numbers, weight classes and preliminary flights.

It is important to note lot numbers dictate the order in which lifters weigh in on Saturday, May 30th.

Thank you and look for more information in the next week!

Lot Number and Flights

 

sykeoutclassicroster

Posted in Meets, News

2015 USA Powerifting Equinox Open on April 11-12

2015 USAPL Equinox Open
This is the Annual Equinox Open. It is an Open Raw meet held on April 11th and 12th.  It is organized by veteran meet director, Evan Davidson. It is being held at a new location this year, Top Tier CrossFit in Columbia MD. This meet will be limited to the first 100 online paid registrations, and has officially reached capacity (See below for “Wait List” information).  This is a popular meet, so it is no surprise that it filled up in about 5 hours from the time that online registration opened.  Participants must be a USA Powerlifting member to lift in this meet so please make sure you have an active membership before the meet. This meet will follow all USA Powerlifting rules and will use the new weight classes. Although this meet has only one Open division, lifters can set or break Maryland State records for their age division.


Meet: 2015 USA Powerlifting Equinox Open

Dates: April 11-12 2015

Online Registration: FULL (See below for information regarding the “Wait List”)

USA Powerlifting Sanction:  # MD-2015-05

Location: Top Tier CrossFit Columbia – 6570 Dobbin Rd., Columbia, MD 21045

Meet Director: Evan Davidson

Divisions:  There is only one division for this meet, the Open division (all ages) for Men and Women. All lifts will be unequipped (raw only meet).


Weight Classes:

  • Weight Classes Women:
    • 43 kg (94.8 lbs) (Junior/Teen only)
    • 47 kg (103.6 lbs)
    • 52 kg (114.6 lbs)
    • 57 kg (125.7 lbs)
    • 63 kg (138.9 lbs)
    • 72 kg (158.7 lbs)
    • 84 kg (185.2 lbs)
    • 84+ kg (185.2+ lbs)
  • Weight Classes Men:
    • 53 kg (116.8 lbs) (Junior/Teen only)
    • 59 kg (130.1 lbs)
    • 66 kg (145.5 lbs)
    • 74 kg (163.1 lbs)
    • 83 kg (183 lbs)
    • 93 kg (205 lbs)
    • 105 kg (231.5 lbs)
    • 120 kg (264.6 lbs)
    • 120+ kg (264.6+ lbs)

Entry Information: 

  • Online Entry and Registration
  • Registration: This meet has reached capacity.
    1. If you have already submitted your entry fee – You will receive a link to online registration emailed in you within 24-48 hours after purchasing.  Please fill out the registration information and click the “Submit: button at the bottom of the form.
    2. If you where not able to get into the meet, we will compile a list of 10 names, creating a “wait list” for the event.  To get on the wait list, please email the Meet Director (email address above).  Include the words “2015 Equinox Open Wait List” in the subject line of your email.  The wait list will be compiled in the order that emails are received.
  • Limited to first 100 lifters.  Capacity has officially been reached.
  • The entry fee will be $79 dollars and the entry is for 1 registered competitor, 1 meet tee shirt, 1 Spectator Ticket
  • Open to all USA Powerlifting members. Membership must be purchased prior to the meet and proof of membership will be required at meet day check-in (proof includes a current USA Powerlifting membership card or email receipt of full payment).
  • You will also need a valid form of ID at check in on meet day.
  • You will need to sign a Release from Liability waiver when you check in.  To view a copy of the waiver ahead of time: click here.
  • 10% of the lifters at this meet will be drug tested for prohibited substances. For the WADA Prohibited Substance list: click here.
  • Awards will be given for the top 3 lifters in each weight class, as well as a best Men’s & Women’s lifter by Wilks total.
  • Tickets for spectators – $5 each, available at the door.
  • All meet entries are final. Refunds or transfers for any reason will not be considered.
  • Weigh in’s as listed below in the preliminary schedule are subject to change due to entries received.  Final session schedule will be posted online one week before the contest.
  • Friday Night: Lifters will have the option to get rack heights on the Friday (4/10/15) between 5:00pm and 7:00pm at the meet location before the event.  Otherwise, lifters can get rack heights the day they check in.

Day 1 Preliminary Schedule (Two Session Meet on Day 1): 

  • Session 1
    • 7:00 AM – Check in all females
    • 7:30-9:00 AM – Weigh in’s begin 1st session only
    • 9:00-9:15 AM – Rules Briefing
    • 9:30 AM – Lifting starts 1st session
  • Session 2
    • 12:00 PM – Check in males up to 83 kg (183 lbs)
    • 12:30-2:00 PM – Weigh in’s begin
    • 2:15-2:30 PM – Rules Briefing
    • 2:45 PM – Lifting starts 2nd session

Day 2 Preliminary Schedule* (One Session Meet on Day 2):

  • Session 1
    • 11:00* AM – Check in males 93 kg (205 lbs) and up
    • 11:30-1:00* PM – Weigh in’s begin
    • 1:00-1:15 PM – Rules Briefing
    • 1:30 PM – Lifting starts 2nd session

*NOTE: Due to Church services in the area, parking will not be available in the main lot until after 1:00 pm on Sunday. Lifters, Judges, and volunteers will be emailed directions to a near by parking lot.


Meet Sponsors:

TopTier


 If this is your first meet


Meet Volunteers

If you would like to help volunteer at this meet, please contact the meet director, Evan Davidson

 

 

ROSTER:

Saturday Session 1:

First Name Last Name State Age Division Weight Class (in KG’s) LOT NUMBER
Shyami Murphy MD 48 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 47 (Women’s) 3
Stephanie Moliterno MD 32 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 52 (Women’s) 16
Tiffany Rohrer MD 20 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 52 (Women’s) 17
Juliana Llop MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 52 (Women’s) 24
Elaine WeddingWire MD 23 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 57 (Women’s) 7
Kimberly Muniz MD 35 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 57 (Women’s) 12
Hieu Truong MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 57 (Women’s) 20
Zoe Ubaldo MD 26 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 4
Lyndsey Mercier VA 25 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 5
Kristen Lang MD 24 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 13
Katie Loomis MD 33 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 15
Sophie Jin MD 22 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 19
Kendall Luz MD 16 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 21
Ashliegh Kling MD 31 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 63 (Women’s) 25
Angie Bryant MD 39 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 72 (Women’s) 11
Karen Gue MD 31 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 72 (Women’s) 14
Kerri Cuddy MD 41 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 72 (Women’s) 18
Patrice Jones MD 38 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 72 (Women’s) 26
Shauna Rowdon MD 32 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84 (Women’s) 1
Kayla Lindsay VA 26 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84 (Women’s) 10
Mallory Sutphin MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84 (Women’s) 22
Angie Layfield MD 35 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84 (Women’s) 23
Amanda Koslow MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84+ (Women’s) 2
Kimberly Muhammad MD 35 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84+ (Women’s) 6
Alison Squiller MD 23 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84+ (Women’s) 8
Mona Becker MD 43 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 84+ (Women’s) 9

 

 

Saturday Session 2:

 

First Name Last Name State Age Division Weight Class (in KG’s) LOT NUMBER
José Romero MD 21 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 53 (Men’s – Junior/ Teen Only) 30
Nick Capicotto “Other” 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 59 (Men’s) 13
Steve Basdavanos MD 61 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 66 (Men’s) 14
Iain Burgess MD 71 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 66 (Men’s) 16
Gino Panameno-Castro MD 23 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 66 (Men’s) 20
Jeff Cohen MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 66 (Men’s) 23
Derrick Chance MD 25 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 3
Dan Levere MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 5
Dylan Ray MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 6
Thomas Potter MD 37 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 7
JJ Barry VA 42 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 8
Doug Myers MD 49 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 9
Justin Rhee MD 22 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 11
Micah Shaffer MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 12
Paul Xu VA 21 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 17
An Vu MD 21 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 21
Zach Johnson MD 20 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 24
Maxwell Holmes MD 21 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 74 (Men’s) 28
Frederick Wall MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 1
John Swenson MD 26 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 2
Elias Zeilah MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 4
Elliott White VA 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 10
Adeola Ashiru MD 18 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 15
David Lindoerfer MD 62 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 18
Huy Vu MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 19
Ryan Stanley MD 26 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 22
Bob Gendler MD 33 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 25
Mike Williams MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 26
Aaron Lane DC 29 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 27
Dylan Jackson MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 83 (Men’s) 29

 

Sunday Session 1:

 

First Name Last Name State Age Division Weight Class (in KG’s) LOT NUMBER
Ryan Revie MD 32 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 3
Ross Bowman VA 23 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 4
Ryan Cluney MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 5
Joseph leary MD 52 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 6
Konstantin Popov “Other” 31 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 8
Eric Shugars MD 25 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 11
Collin Morstein MD 24 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 12
Khaled Abdelatey VA 15 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 16
Michael Riley MD 20 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 23
Frankie Balint VA 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 24
William Bowman MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 26
Brad Friedman MD 31 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 28
Timothy Clavelli MD 22 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 29
Patrick Chew MD 18 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 32
Zach (Reuven) Tolchin MD 34 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 33
Evan Morton MD 20 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 35
Michael Christensen MD 19 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 36
Andrew Brown VA 23 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 38
Bryan Opitz MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 93 (Men’s) 40
Mark Chaffer MD 25 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 2
Will Slade MD 50 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 7
Dylan Smith VA 26 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 10
Bruce Knox MD 29 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 13
Kaisheem Muhammad MD 38 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 14
Horacio Nochetto MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 17
Steven Barker MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 19
Alan Howlett MD 58 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 20
Tom Haifley MD 40 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 25
Austin Cooper MD 18 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 27
Kevin Wittmer MD 28 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 30
Jared Michael MD 20 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 31
Romaine Bostick DC 42 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 105 (Men’s) 37
Greg Brock MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 1
Grady Lincalis MD 25 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 9
Matthew Cronin VA 24 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 15
Wayne Eyler MD 33 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 21
Aryhel Freeman MD 30 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 22
Alejandro Valencia VA 32 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 34
Ahmed Mohamed MD 18 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120 (Men’s) 41
Keenan Ports PA 29 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120+ (Men’s) 18
David Puckett MD 31 Open Raw – Full Powerlifting Meet 120+ (Men’s) 39

 

Explanation of lot numbers: Lot numbers are used to dictate the order of weigh ins, and to determine the order of attempts at the same weight. In each case, the lower lot number is first.

 

Tagged with:
Posted in Meets, News

USA Powerlifting Eastern Regional Powerlifting Open March 21, 2015

Our next meet is March 21, 2015 and it is the first Maryland meet with the new weight classes.  It is the 2015 USA Powerlifting Eastern Regional Powerlifting Open.  The meet director is Brian Washington, a veteran strength sport meet director and promoter.  Brian has put on powerlifting meets in Maryland for other powerlifting federations and the Maryland Chapter for USA Powerlifting is glad that Brian is again promoting USA Powerlifting meets.   There is another USA Powerlifting meet that Brian has already planned for July 11th of this year.  This is a great benefit for Maryland lifters as these two additional meets are in addition to our normal meet schedule.

Meet:  2015 USA Powerlifting Eastern Regional Powerlifting Open

Date:  March 21, 2015

Location: Exile Fitness 8101 Pulaski Highway, Rosedale, Maryland 21237.

Meet Director – Brian Washington, Brian@usbf.net

USA Powerlifting Sanction – #MD-2015-01

Divisions – the powerlifting meet will include the following divisions:

  • Raw Full-Lift Open
  • Raw Full-Lift Juniors
  • Raw Full-Lift Sub-Masters
  • Raw Full-Lift Masters
  • Raw Bench Only Open
  • Raw Bench Only Juniors
  • Raw Bench Only Sub-Masters
  • Raw Bench Only Masters
  • Raw Deadlift Only Open
  • Raw Deadlift Only Juniors
  • Raw Deadlift Only Sub-Masters
  • Raw Deadlift Only Masters

Weight Classes:

  • Weight Classes Women:
    • 43 kg (94.8 lbs) (Junior/Teen only)
    • 47 kg (103.6 lbs)
    • 52 kg (114.6 lbs)
    • 57 kg (125.7 lbs)
    • 63 kg (138.9 lbs)
    • 72 kg (158.7 lbs)
    • 84 kg (185.2 lbs)
    • 84+ kg (185.2+ lbs)
  • Weight Classes Men:
    • 53 kg (116.8 lbs) (Junior/Teen only)
    • 59 kg (130.1 lbs)
    • 66 kg (145.5 lbs)
    • 74 kg (163.1 lbs)
    • 83 kg (183 lbs)
    • 93 kg (205 lbs)
    • 105 kg (231.5 lbs)
    • 120 kg (264.6 lbs)
    • 120+ kg (264.6+ lbs)

Registration – The registration was online

Lifter Limit – only accepting the first 50 lifters.  There will be no waiting lists.  Once the contest is closed, the link will take you to a page stating that “Registration Is Closed”.

USA Powerlifting Membership Required – It is stronly recommended you purchase a membership before the day of the meet. Join now at http://www.usapowerlifting.com/membership-application/

Location – Exile Fitness – 8101 Pulaski Highway, Rosedale, MD 21237

Times – Weigh-ins 7:00 AM-8:30 AM. Rules Briefing 8:45 AM, lifting starts at 9:00 AM.

Flights are:

SQUAT

A=ALL FEMALES + 145&UNDER

B=163 & 183

C=205

D=231&OVER

BENCH

A=ALL FEMALES

B=163&UNDER

C=183

D=205

E=231&OVER

DEADLIFT

A=ALL FEMALES & 130&UNDER

B=145 THRU 183

C=205

D=231&OVER

Roster:

NAME ST. WT. CL. B.WT. Age SEX *DIV
094 – FEMALE JR & SUB JR XXX 94 94
103 – FEMALE XXX 103 103
114 – FEMALE XXX 114 114
116 – MALE JR & SUB JR XXX 116 116
JACOB SCIBELLI VA 116.80 116.80 14 M PL-J14-15
125 – FEMALE XXX 125 125
JOY BURG VA 125.70 125.70 49 F BP-M45-49
JOY BURG VA 125.70 125.70 49 F DL-M45-49
CASEY FEINSTEIN MD 125.70 125.70 14 F PL-J14-15
HOLLY KLINK MD 125.70 125.70 44 F PL-M40-44
JOY BURG VA 125.70 125.70 49 F PL-M45-49
JOANNA RANDAZZO MD 125.70 125.70 30 F PL-O
130 – MALE XXX 130 130
DAVID EDMUND MD 130.10 130.10 36 M PL-O
138 – FEMALE XXX 138 138
RUPA DAINER MD 138.90 138.90 38 F BP-O
TROIXGEIMNE HUNT MD 138.90 138.90 24 F BP-O
TIERRA TUCKER MD 138.90 138.90 25 F BP-O
RUPA DAINER MD 138.90 138.90 38 F BP-SM
ALICE ZHENG NJ 138.90 138.90 23 F PL-J20-23
TROIXGEIMNE HUNT MD 138.90 138.90 24 F PL-O
ERICA ISAACS DE 138.90 138.90 25 F PL-O
145 – MALE XXX 145 145
GINO PANAMENO-CASTRO MD 145.50 145.50 23 M PL-J20-23
JEFF COHEN MD 145.50 145.50 31 M PL-O
158 – FEMALE XXX 158 158
ESPERANZA ESPINOSA VA 158.70 158.70 33 F BP-O
SHELBY DOMARASKY MD 158.70 158.70 21 F DL-J20-23
ALEXANDRA BIGA MD 158.70 158.70 27 F PL-O
SIVAN FAGAN MD 158.70 158.70 27 F PL-O
163 – MALE XXX 163 163
CHRISTOPHER NORTHERN MD 163.10 163.10 19 M BP-J18-19
AUSTIN AYALA MD 163.10 163.10 19 M PL-J18-19
MENACHEM PASTERNAK MD 163.10 163.10 22 M PL-J20-23
JERRY DUDLEY MD 163.10 163.00 33 M PL-O
183 – MALE XXX 183 183
COLBY EVANS MD 183.00 183.00 41 M BP-M40-44
CONRAD REYNOLDS MD 183.00 183.00 38 M BP-O
ANDREW SARNO MD 183.00 183.00 55 M DL-M55-59
ALEXANDER SPENCER MD 183.00 183.00 22 M PL-J20-23
RYAN WOOD DE 183.00 183.00 21 M PL-J20-23
EDWIN JULIEN MD 183.00 183.00 41 M PL-M40-44
SAM PENNER MD 183.00 183.00 84 M PL-M80-84
AARON BATE MD 183.00 183.00 29 M PL-O
SEAN CHUA DC 183.00 183.00 24 M PL-O
BEAU GUTRIDGE VA 183.00 183.00 18 M PL-O
EDWIN JULIEN MD 183.00 183.00 41 M PL-O
GARY PIECUCH MD 183.00 183.00 31 M PL-O
MICHAEL SHAFFER MD 183.00 183.00 26 M PL-O
185 – FEMALE XXX 185 185
185+ – FEMALE XXX 185 185
MICHELLE ARNOLD MD 185.25 185.25 44 F PL-M
205 – MALE XXX 205 205
ALEXANDER DOWNEY MD 205.00 205.00 23 M PL-J20-23
CASEY MANN MD 205.00 205.00 23 M PL-J20-23
MORDECHAI BARRON MD 205.00 205.00 23 M PL-O
NATHAN COOK MD 205.00 205.00 29 M PL-O
GABRIEL KALLEN WV 205.00 205.00 27 M PL-O
STEPHEN MCCLUNG MD 205.00 205.00 30 M PL-O
JOHN SIMPSON MD 205.00 205.00 32 M PL-O
ANTHONY SMITH MD 205.00 205.00 29 M PL-O
DUSTIN STARER PA 205.00 205.00 28 M PL-O
231 – MALE XXX 231 231
MIKE MUSKEY MD 231.50 231.50 46 M BP-M45-49
MIKE MUSKEY MD 231.50 231.50 46 M BP-O
JAMES POLEDNA MD 231.50 231.50 29 M BP-O
MICHAEL BENNETT MD 231.50 231.50 53 M DL-M50-54
MICHAEL BENNETT MD 231.50 231.50 53 M PL-M50-54
DOUGLAS MCMILLAN MD 231.50 231.50 35 M PL-O
BRYAN SCHAEFFER PA 231.50 231.50 35 M PL-O
TOM SCIBELLI MD 231.50 231.50 32 M PL-O
JAMES WEBBER MD 231.50 231.50 29 M PL-O
264 – MALE XXX 264 264
DONALD FROST MD 264.60 264.60 66 M BP-M65-69
FRANCIS DAWSON MD 264.60 264.60 25 M PL-O
MICHAEL JONES MD 264.60 264.60 39 M PL-O
SCOTT KOSCIELNIAK MD 264.60 264.60 31 M PL-O
264+ – MALE XXX 265 265
TIMOTHY SEWELL MD SHW 265.00 29 M BP-O
JUSTIN ISAACS DE SHW 265.00 26 M PL-O
TIMOTHY SEWELL MD SHW 265.00 29 M PL-O
Tagged with:
Posted in Meets, News

The SSPT Pull-up Program

MattWeightedPullUp2Every human should be able to do one pull-up. If you can’t, you’re either too fat, weak, or both. Pull-up ability is largely a function of strength to bodyweight ratio. This explains why some men can deadlift 700+ pounds while some women are well into the 400s and beyond, but neither is able perform a single pull-up. While deadlifting may be the truest test of total body strength with a barbell, pull-ups demand greater balance and coordination than bending over and picking something up. Therefore, devoting some of your training time to pull-ups can pay dividends in a variety of athletic endeavors.

Pull-ups have less to do with one’s total body mass and more to do with your body composition. A prime example is current USA Powerlifting American Record holder in the squat, Ray Williams. Ray weighs about 170kg (374-pounds). In addition to routinely squatting 900+ pounds, Ray can do 10 pull-ups. Here’s a young woman executing 19 flawless pull-ups. Lastly, here’s former gymnast and current 52kg USA Powerlifting American Record holder Marisa Inda demonstrating prodigious strength with her unique twist on pull-ups using a Smith Machine.

In my 2008 article, I argued that the pull-up was the squat for the upper body. My stance hasn’t softened. The pull-up has been, is, and always will be one of the best exercises for upper body development and strength. They specifically target the middle to upper back and the since the back is a focal point in all three powerlifts, the pull-up is a vital exercise for any strength athlete.

Pull-ups are one of SSPT’s big five movements including the squat, deadlift, bench press, and overhead press. As long as the trainee exhibits no significant physical constraints of the elbow, shoulder, or wrist, every strength training program should include pull-ups. In addition to building a stronger, thicker back, pull-ups really build the bench press because the actions of scapular depression and retraction are similar to setting-up for a heavy bench. Consequently, they remain a staple in all of our lifters’ training plans.

This article is aimed at trainees capable of performing at least two strict bodyweight pull-ups. Strict pull-ups are defined as starting from an elbows-extended, straight-arm, dead-hang position followed by pulling the body upward until the chin is above the bar from which you are pulling. After reaching the top position, lower the body to the start position.

We use the SSPT Pull-up Program with our athletes, general population, and lifters. When followed correctly, this program produces amazing results. Here’s how to implement it:

Step 1: Test your max reps via one set to positive muscle failure. Positive muscle failure occurs when you can no longer pull your chin above the bar.

You should be fresh so choose a day when you can test first in your training session. Begin with one set at about half your bodyweight. For those with access to an assisted chin/dip machine, set the weight at 50% of your bodyweight and perform one set of approximately five to eight reps. If you don’t have access to an assisted machine, then use a heavy band. The idea is to warm-up first, ignite your nervous system, and prime your muscles for the all-out effort. Rest a minimum of three minutes. Now test with the grip you plan on using during most of your training. We mostly prefer the gold standard, double-overhand grip but if you have shoulder issues or mobility limitations, then implement another grip. Do not perform any additional pull-ups on test day.

Step 2: Record the number of full reps you achieved. Divide that number in half and that’s the number of reps/set you’ll be doing at the start of your plan. Essentially, your sets will be done with 50% of your max. If your max is an odd number of reps like 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 then your starting point is 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 reps respectively. Always round down. Never round up, as it will blunt progress.

When? Pull-ups will be performed once per week. While rows are the antagonist action to horizontal pushes like the bench press, the pull-up is the opposite move of a vertical push like overhead presses. Pull-ups pair well with overhead presses and/or a second bench press day. If that doesn’t mesh with your current training template then simply fit them in on a day when they won’t inhibit another big lift. In other words, pull-ups should always be performed after your sport-form work.

How? Other pull-up plans focus on accumulating reps with sets taken to failure. Training to failure is a dead-end. It may work for a few weeks but it engrains bad technique and almost always ends badly. Let’s say your current pull-ups max is four reps and your plan calls for three sets to failure. Here’s how it’s likely to look:

Set 1: 4 reps

You rest a while and tackle your second set.

Set 2: you’re usually lucky to get 3 reps

You rest a while and tackle your third set.

Set 3: you’ll be lucky to 1 or 2 reps

Rep total = 9

Taking each set to failure adversely affects the following set. With nine reps, you enter the second week hoping to get more than nine. You might end up with 10 and even 11 the following week but you’ll soon regress and cease to make progress.

In the same manner we build training volume for the powerlifts, the SSPT Pull-up Program accumulates volume through the number of sets performed rather than the number of reps per set. In this case, you’ll always begin with 50% of your max (or slightly less if your max reps is an odd number). This ensures that you won’t train to failure, which increases the number of approaches (sets) and also the probability of enhanced technique via a more positive motor pattern. At SSPT, our volume goal (for most trainees) is roughly 20-25 weighted pull-up reps/week. Regardless of your current ability, you’ll notice each week starts at roughly half the volume goal or 10-12 total reps.

Looking at the spreadsheet below, find your max reps and follow the weekly plan in a sets x reps fashion. As you’re starting with 50% of your max reps, the sets should be reasonably easy. Resist the temptation to start at a different week or do more reps. This is not some quick fix routine claiming to have you at 20 reps next week. This plan is intended for trainees with a consistent, industrious, and patient demeanor.

Sample plans

You’re not racing against a clock and proper form is critical. The key is building strength with pristine form and masterful technique on every rep. Therefore; you should absolutely rest as long as necessary between sets. The key is accumulating all of the volume in each session.  If you suffer from training ADD and can’t bring yourself to rest long enough between sets, you may superset pull-ups with another exercise but your performance mustn’t come at the expense of leaving the gym earlier.

The plans are linear from week to week and the reps eventually undulate as you accrue volume. Some of our pull-up training is drawn out much longer but each of the sample plans recommend retesting in the tenth week. Once you retest, take your new max and follow the plan again using your new number. For those strong enough to perform 10 or more reps with bodyweight, you’ll soon add weight with a chin/dip belt, weighted vest, or even chains. Weight increases are usually 2.5 pounds for women and 5 for men (10 for the super-strong).

Meanwhile, here’s a look at a few success stories from SSPTers who used our pull-up program:

Theresa Ball increased her max reps from 6 to 10.

Colleen McNamara went from 3 reps to 8 in only four months while also increasing her bodyweight from 114 to 118.

Vanessa “PrettySTRONG” Gale started with 2 reps at a bodyweight of 138 and increased her max to 10 reps.

Sandra Sebastian went from 6 to 9 reps in only 12 weeks.

In 2011, Rob Schmidt doubled his max reps from 5 to 10 reps in nine weeks.

Elliott White went from 14 reps to 19 reps in 10 weeks while increasing his bodyweight from 193 to 197.

People tend to gravitate toward things they excel at while avoiding difficult tasks.   The same is true with pull-ups. Heavier lifters avoid them like the plague while other trainees fail to recognize the benefits. The bottom line is that pull-ups help build an impressive physique and can contribute greatly to practically every barbell lift.

Success isn’t an accident and training shouldn’t be arbitrary. Oftentimes lifters test strength rather than taking the time to build it. Improving at pull-ups may take some time. Patience, consistency, and hard work are the bedrock of long-term gains. Trust the plan, stay the course, and be gracious for gains both large and small. Remember that progress, no matter how small or incremental, is still progress.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Welcome to the New Maryland Powerlifting Website

We are excited to provide our loyal lifters and followers with a new and enhanced website.  This new website platform has a lot of updated features that simply were not possible on the old website.

Here is a quick list of new items:

  1. Better real-time integration with our Facebook page (facebook.com/mdpower) so people not on Facebook can follow discussions and posts and information being shared there.
  2. Integration with our Twitter account (@MDPower). All our Twitter activity can be seen here, just in case you are not not Twitter. Although we don’t have much Twitter activity now, we expect that to change this year – and we will be ready.
  3. Integration with our Instagram account (@marylandpowerlifting) so when we post pictures and short videos on Instagram, you see them here too.  We recently rolled this out at our 2014 MD States Championship meet and took a few pictures and video.  Similar to our Twitter account, we expect a lot more activity on Instagram this year.
  4. Mobile ready.  This website uses a responsive design that changes based on the screen size of your device.  There is no separate mobile site needed – just use this same website and the layout changes if your are on your phone, tablet, or laptop.
  5. This is a WordPress website.  You can “Follow” this website by clicking on the Follow button. This will let you choose to receive alerts when new information is posted on this website.
  6. WordPress allows for multiple “webmasters”.  WordPress provides easy to use tools to create new posts, update pages, post meet results, and update state records.  Instead of one single webmaster, tasks such as updating state records and posting meet results can now be shared with multiple approved users.
  7. Better Search.  The search box on the home page now searches all pages and posts. The search on the old website only allowed one single keyword and didn’t search all content.
  8. Comment on posts.  WordPress allows you to add your own comments to posts.  This creates the opportunity to have a running dialog directly on this website about a specific topic.

Why a new website was needed – There were numerous reasons to move to a new website platform. The old website was starting to have technical issues and was starting to go down more often – leaving visitors with only a “Service Unavailable” page.  The old website was nearly 10 years old and built on technology that is no longer supported so in many ways, we were forced to find an alternative.  This created a wonderful opportunity to set up Maryland Powerlifting for our future needs.

New weight classes for meets and state records – All the old records have been moved to this new website as an archive along with new State Records at the new weight classes.  The records were converted according to USA Powerlifting guidelines.

Migrating content to the new website – Content from the old website has been migrated to this new website including all the Matt Gary articles, old and new state records, all available meet results, powerlifting rules, and other necessary pages.  We were unable to migrate some of the customized database features from the old website such as the top 5 lifters from the last 5 meets.

Suggestions welcome – We certainly welcome any suggestions for improvement.  Simply add your comments directly to this post.

 

 

Tagged with: ,
Posted in News

State Records Converted to New Weight Classes

Maryland State Records are grouped by age class on this website.  On each age class page, the records are broken out by weight class as well as whether the lift was performed Unequipped or Equipped.  For record keeping purposes the term Raw is used for unequipped.

ConvertingRecordsToNewWeightClassesStarting January 1, 2015, meets and state records have new weight classes.  In accordance with USA Powerlifting  guidelines, existing state records under the old weight classes were converted as of December 31, 2014 to the new weight classes based solely on weight class (not a lifter’s body weight).  Records under the old weight classes have been archived and are located directly under the new weight classes on the same age class page.

USA Powerlifting members that are residents of Maryland or Washington, DC are eligible to set and break Maryland state records according to the rules of competition.  If you have any questions or would like to report a new record (from a meet on or after 1/1/2015), please contact the State Chair.

Tagged with: ,
Posted in News

Results and Records from the 2014 MD States

Results and State Records have been posted from the 2014 USA Powerlifting Maryland State Powerlifting Championship.

Results: https://marylandpowerlifting.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/2014-maryland-states.pdf

State Records: https://marylandpowerlifting.com/records

 

 

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Meets, News

SSPT Deadlift Training

The squat is the king of all exercises but the deadlift is the purest test of total-body strength. The deadlift primarily focuses on the musculature of the back, hips, and legs while recruiting just about as many muscles as any other exercise. The concentric-only nature of the deadlift is unique to the powerlifts because the squat and bench press both afford the lifter an opportunity to lower the bar first before actually lifting it. Without the eccentric phase, it’s nearly impossible to generate any momentum and stretch reflex utilization is practically non-existent. A belt, knee sleeves, suits, and wraps offer the least ergogenic aid in the deadlift. Accordingly, one’s performance in the deadlift is largely determined by three factors: genetics, technique, and training.

Genetics (Leverage)

As with all athletic endeavors, genetics play a major role in aptitude and performance. The most favorable physical attributes for the deadlift are a short torso, long arms, and long legs. Lamar Gant possessed all three traits in addition to having severe scoliosis which helped him become the only person to deadlift over five times bodyweight in two weight classes. The torso acts like a lever and does the lion’s share of the work. A shorter torso makes for a shorter moment arm while longer thighs creates a higher pivot point at the hips. Long arms simply decrease the distance of bar travel from the floor to lockout. A deadlifter’s physique is mostly opposite to the desired characteristics for squatting and bench pressing. Longer arms and legs usually translate to more work being done. But, in the case of the deadlift, longer limbs actually mean a more efficient movement.

Technique

The powerlifts should be viewed as movements executed rather than muscles used. Executing deep barbell squats, paused bench presses, and locked out deadlifts with significant weight requires kinesthetic awareness and skill. Any klutz can use their muscles for curls. At SSPT, it’s never a leg, chest, or back day. It’s squat, bench press, and deadlift day.

SSPT lifters don’t exercise. They train because training is our practice. After all, strength is a skill and skills are refined through extensive practice. Consistent, quality, and repetitious practice leads to technical mastery. Therefore, technique is the single most important factor in acquiring and performing a skill. Without solid technique, skill acquisition and strength development takes longer thereby forcing one to rely more heavily on genetics and ergogenic aids. 

Developing appropriate deadlift technique should be largely based upon one’s anthropometry. Limb and torso length usually determine how you’re going perform the deadlift. The most perceivable aspect of deadlift style is stance. Deadlift stance is expressed across a broad continuum with frog-style, conventional stance pullers like Lamar Gant and Vince Anello at one end of the spectrum and ultra-wide, sumo lifters like Eric Kupperstein and Wei-Ling Chen at the other. Most of us fit somewhere in between.

conventionaldeadlift1conventionaldeadlift2 sumodeadlift1 sumodeadlift2

I’m frequently asked about my preference for foot placement. My stock reply is, “I’m not married to any stance other than the one where you can lift the most weight.” Lifters tend to place their feet where they’re most comfortable. When a lifter is in a comfortable position, they typically move more proficiently. It’s incumbent upon the lifter to experiment with both styles and see what works best for them according to their leverages.

The default deadlift stance is conventional because it resembles the “athletic position” which translates better to most activities and sports.  The athletic position is approximately shoulder or hip width. You see it all the time in baseball, basketball, boxing, football, and tennis to name a few. I coach my conventional stance deadlifters to stand where they would for a vertical jump test. This is routinely the place where most people are able to generate and transfer the most force into the ground. When using a conventional stance, the toes are pointed out slightly while the hands are placed just outside of the legs thus elongating the arms.

A sumo (wide) stance deadlift, with the feet placed outside the body, is irrefutably more efficient by shortening the distance of bar travel. However, what one gains in efficiency they often lose in force transfer. This is also seen with wide-grip benchers who struggle to get the weight moving off the chest or the wide-stance squatters who grapple with hitting depth and coming out of the hole. Sumo deadlifters are routinely slower from the floor and then accelerate through to lockout whereas the conventional style is usually opposite.

Powerlifters should opt for the stance that enables them to lift the most weight. Regardless of one’s preferred stance, body position is vital. Four crucial criteria must be satisfied to ensure the proper start position in the deadlift:

  1. The bar must be placed over the middle of the foot. This isn’t the part of the foot you can see when you look down but rather the mid-foot. Typically the bar needs to be about one to two inches away from the shins depending upon the length of the foot, height of the lifter, and hamstring flexibility.
  2. The arms must be kept straight and locked in extension.
  3. The back should be held in rigid extension and as flat as possible. Slight thoracic kyphosis (rounding) is acceptable provided the lifter maintains intra-abdominal pressure and tightness throughout the torso.
  4. The scapulae (shoulder blades / armpit crease) must be directly over the bar.

The photo (seen below) illustrates the proper start position for the deadlift. Notice how the arms, thighs, and back form a triangle. Each person’s triangle varies based upon his or her own unique structure. Longer thighs lead to a higher hip position while shorter arms lead to a more forward or horizontal torso. Regardless of what your triangle looks like, the hips will be in the correct spot as long as you satisfy the four, all-important technical standards. If you’ve never been in this proper start position before, your hips will feel abnormally high. But I can assure you; they’re exactly where they’re supposed to be. In fact, a properly executed deadlift will feel like a shorter movement due to the vertical-only bar path.

AFTER

Neglecting any of those technical principles will significantly compromise the movement and lead to decrements in performance. A slight, initial rise of the hips, at the start of the pull, is not in and of itself a technical flaw so long as you’re in the correct start position. Hip rise is frequently a sign of not being tight enough. Just remember that maximal attempts won’t always look like ballet and things do tend to break down. This isn’t the end of the world but we should all train with the goal of becoming as strong as possible and therefore delaying the onset of form breakdowns. The longer you can hold your optimal position during a max attempt, the better off you’ll be.

Oftentimes improper bar and shoulder placement give way to both hip rise and horizontal bar displacement in what should ideally be a vertical-only lift. This horizontal movement known as “hook” is an unwanted technical inefficiency. Sumo deadlifters are famous for this when trying to squat the weight up. Occasionally you’ll hear one quip, “The deadlift is just a squat with the bar held in front of you.” Don’t believe this fallacy. The deadlift is not a squat. Oppositely, the deadlift is a hip-hinge movement with the ultimate goal of the bar and hips meeting in the finished position. While the squat is a leg-dominant movement assisted by the back, the deadlift is a back-dominant movement assisted by the legs. Much is different between the squat and deadlift including bar placement, hand position, stance, center of gravity management, muscle contraction sequencing, and the degree of knee and trunk flexion vs. hip extension. As a result of these differences, it’s reasonable to approach deadlift training differently than the squat or bench press.

Training

Like the squat and bench press, deadlifting is a skill. Only a heretic would advise not deadlifting as the optimal means for building a bigger deadlift. That’s like telling a world-class violinist to spend their time practicing on the tuba. If you want to deadlift more, you should deadlift more.

The two primary ways of training the deadlift are with multiple repetitions or singles. And while there are examples of world-class deadlifters using the multiple reps approach, at SSPT, we much prefer singles and for good reason.

There’s an old deadlift axiom that says, “If you can hit it for one rep, you can probably do two.” This is the direct result of using stored elastic energy on the eccentric portion of the start of the second rep. Lowering the weight first enables us to build tension, generate momentum, and employ the stretch reflex. Even if you perform multiple repetitions in a “dead-stop” fashion, the successive reps are still easier because of the tension you’ve built on the eccentric phase of the preceding reps.

Multiple-rep sets of deadlift are more appropriate for bodybuilders, fitness enthusiasts, strongman competitors, and other strength athletes who want to put on some muscle and/or increase their muscular endurance.  More time under tension may help your muscles grow but, for powerlifters, our singular objective is lifting maximum weight. In terms of deadlift training for a one-rep max, singles are more optimal.

On numerous occasions I have seen lifters perform heavy doubles or triples in training and then barely be able to complete their attempt at the meet with the same weight. This is especially true of those who bounce or use a “touch n go” style. This enables trainees to use energy from the floor to assist in lifting the weight. At competitions, all deadlifts begin motionless from the floor so the multiple reps approach is irrelevant in terms of building momentum at the start. Furthermore, multiple-rep sets arguably lead to greater degrees of fatigue and higher susceptibility to injury. With multiple reps, lower back fatigue eventually becomes a limiting factor resulting in technical breakdowns.

Performing singles in the deadlift doesn’t mean coming into the gym, loading the bar to your maximum weight, pulling it once, and going home. Deadlift training requires a planned and systematic approach of using percentages for multiple singles then attacking the muscles that are germane to the movement. An additional benefit to training the deadlift with multiple singles is more practice. 

Powerlifting may be the best example of a “practice like you play” sport. Lifters should strive to simulate meet conditions in training as often as possible and singles afford you that opportunity. Singles allow you to treat each rep as its own attempt or set. You can practice visualization, set-up, breathing, and technique with each one. With multiple-rep approaches, you only get one shot on the first rep of each set.

For example, let’s assume Lifter A deadlifts 440-pounds (200kg) for one set of 10 reps.  This equates to a total training volume of roughly 4,400-pounds (2000kg). Odds are high that the lifter exerted tremendous effort during the set and the last few reps probably looked pretty ugly due to accumulated fatigue and subsequent technical breakdowns. Such a Herculean effort would likely require a long rest period before an additional set was attempted. On the other hand, Lifter B performs 10 sets of 1 rep with the same weight. The total training volume is identical but Lifter B was afforded 10 times as many opportunities to practice their sport-form skills of setting-up, breathing, and executing the lift to standard. Short rest periods between reps enabled Lifter B to regroup, perhaps chalk their hands, and reset before the next rep. Furthermore, each rep was a first rep that wasn’t influenced by momentum or the stretch reflex. Performing ten “first” reps increases skill acquisition and the likelihood of enhanced technique. Stop looking at volume like endless toil and start seeing it through a different lens.  Be thankful for the additional opportunities to improve and sharpen your skills. 

It’s difficult to generate momentum in the deadlift because we must overcome inertia on the bar.  You’re not apt to get a heavy weight moving from the floor by pulling it slowly. Deadlifts need to be done explosively with a focus on technique and speed. Singles allow you to be explosive and deliver maximum force into the barbell each time. Multiple repetitions do not allow the same velocity because as the set continues, bar speed significantly decreases with each repetition. As form breaks down over the set, the risk of injury may increase and you’re not likely to be in the correct start position again after the first rep. This is not the preferred combination and doesn’t set the table for an optimal training environment. Moreover, singles allow you to train the deadlift more frequently and at higher intensities. Muscle damage is reduced and greater loads can be used. Increasing frequency and intensity helps bridge the volume gap created by doing one rep per set as opposed to multiple reps.

It’s all about skill acquisition. Here’s a look at three sample 10-week plans featuring varied frequency, intensities, and volume:

sampledeadliftcycle

The above plans are linear from week to week. With the first option, you may add some back down (fatigue drop) singles in the latter weeks to accommodate for the reduction in volume but it’s not always necessary. The second two examples place the heaviest deadlifts earlier in the week. That can be switched to meet your schedule and/or create a different undulation. Our long-term planning is more undulating in nature with the majority of our training occurring in the 80-89% range. There are enormous benefits to hovering around that intensity. It’s light enough where one can perform lots of volume to acquire skill without overtraining or needing a deload. On the other hand, it’s heavy enough to elicit a significant strength response and keep lifters close to top form. When 80-89% is your home base, you’re never very far from bringing your strength to a peak. You can create your own training plan using SSPT’s Deadlift Table. The options are infinite.

We train like we compete so most training sessions begin with squats and we always squat before deadlifting. The squat serves as a warm-up for the deadlift and prepares us for the rigors of game day. When using the once/week option above, the deadlifts are performed after a high-volume, medium-intensity squat. Later in the week, we’ll squat heavy immediately followed by a special deadlift assistance exercise based on our individual weaknesses. You’ll rarely see anyone at SSPT deadlifting with the opposite grip or stance. Our specific deadlift assistance exercises closely resemble the competition style deadlift and are most often trained in the one to three rep range but sometimes as high as four or five. We may select from deficit, halting (pause), rack/block (partials), Romanian deadlifts, or even add chains. These assistance deadlift moves are typically implemented via Rates of Perceived Exertion (RPE) or percentages (of our DL max) for three to four consecutive weeks over the course of a single training block. After using a special exercise for one block, we’ll switch it for another. Training sessions are occasionally finished with a non-specific (supplemental) posterior chain movement but always with some direct (weighted) abdominal work.

Most of our cycles end with our final heavy deadlift about 10-14 days out from a meet. For those worried about losing skill over the final week, rest easy. You’re not going to magically forget how to deadlift overnight. Your body will supercompensate and thank you for the additional rest. You want to head into the meet with a ravenous attitude. There’s nothing worse than feeling overtrained and leaving your heaviest deadlift in the gym. You do not need to test (max) the deadlift in training to hit a personal record (PR) at the meet. Most of our competition (peaking blocks) preparation ends at roughly 95% of our max. The deadlift is the powerlift most affected by game day adrenaline. Rest assured if your 95% singles go smoothly in training, you’ll be good for significantly more at the meet. Even our second attempts in competition are often heavier than our final heavy single in training and they are always faster.

In preparation for the 2014 USA Powerlifting Raw Nationals, my final heavy single in training was 567-pounds (257.5kg) on Monday, July 7. On Sunday, July 20, I nailed 573-pounds (260kg) on my second attempt en route to an all-time beltless PR of 600-pounds (272.5kg) on my third. The PR was never in doubt. Starting months in advance, I visualized and performed it hundreds of times in my mind before ever stepping on the platform.  I always use a winning mental approach because attitude is everything. On game day it all boils down to attempt selection and execution. Everything else is trivial and you’ll never find me on Facebook or Twitter between attempts.

aristotle

The great Greek philosopher Aristotle said, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” Focus on the process, commit to consistency, and strive for technical mastery. The results will take care of themselves. You may not break a world record but with a single rep at a time; you can become an excellent deadlifter.

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Upholding the Standard – Part 2

3whiteLightsOwn your performance and take responsibility for your actions. That was the mandate issued in Upholding the Standard in March 2012 and while the more things change, the more they stay the same.

I measure individual powerlifting performances by the number of successful lifts, personal records (PR) achieved, and placing within a weight class and/or age group. I also grade novices or intermediates on technical improvements and becoming more acclimated to the competitive experience. Six successful attempts out of nine is a satisfactory, on-the-line performance. Fewer than six successful attempts are below the line while more than six usually represent a favorable outcome. Personal records should be reserved for your third attempt. Unfortunately, no matter how good you are, you’ll never make all of those. Like golfers who can replay every shot in their round, powerlifters will recall the chapter of each attempt within the greater story of their entire meet. And while, we all have a narrative to share about our performances, the final stats are usually pretty clear as to whether the ending was happy or regrettable. Frankly, we can all stand to become better competitors. After all, competing is a skill and none of us will ever be perfect. So, strive for perfection and settle for excellence.

Much of my coaching nowadays is devoted to creating optimal training and competitive environments for my athletes. I’ve repeatedly outlined my approach to attempt selection and continue dedicating significant time to data collection of meet results to show correlations between successful attempts, personal records, and winning. While there is no sure-fire recipe to guarantee flawless performances, my game plans increase the probability of success and my lifters are mostly successful.

Make no mistake about it — results in every arena are directly attributable to execution. While coaches make a huge impact on the outcome, the end result is ultimately left to the performers. Players make plays just like lifters make lifts and I’ll never take credit away from a lifter who achieves a PR. They deserve the credit. It’s my job to point them in the right direction with a wise plan of attack, instill confidence, and create the best possible scenario for them to succeed. But, in the end, it’s always up to the lifter to execute. They have to walk onto the platform alone and make the lift. I can’t do it for them.

Execution boils down to skillfully performing the lifts according to the rules of performance. We all view powerlifting through a different lens. Fortunately, my 18 years in the sport has given me a variety of perspectives: coach, competitor, fan, and referee. Each perspective offers a varying view. But one song remains the same… rules are in place for a reason and should be adhered to at all times.

Every game or sport has rules. Rules establish boundaries and ensure uniform high-quality competition. These standards of expectation allow us to compare performances. Without them, we might as well be comparing carburetors to swampland.

The vast majority of the lifters I coach compete in USA Powerlifting. USA Powerlifting is the largest American powerlifting federation at nearly 4,500 members. The various USA Powerlifting National Championships are the gateway into the International Powerlifting Federation (IPF), which is the largest international group, at roughly 95 member federations, and offers the only true world championships. Lifters may also qualify to compete regionally in the North American Powerlifting Federation (NAPF), which is a division of the IPF. In my view, these federations offer the premier level of uniform high quality, drug tested competition.

SSPT and RTS crew

RTS and SSPT joined forces in July 2013 to uphold their impeccable standards and take team titles at USA Powerlifting Raw Nationals

The bedrock of these organizations and the competitions they provide is a strict and rigid adherence to the rules. The rules include standards for apparel, weigh-in and start times, flight size, drug testing, and the all-important rules of performance. Officials range from meet director, to Technical Controller, doping officers, expediters, scoring persons, and obviously the referees, enforce the rules. Referees are human. They occasionally make mistakes but operate with high integrity and usually get it right. Squats must be sunk below parallel, benches are paused with feet flat and three points of contact to the bench, and deadlifts need to be completely locked out without any downward movement of the bar. These standards are a few of the key pieces highlighting the USA Powerlifting and IPF technical rulebooks. One thing is certain, when you review results from USA Powerlifting, IPF, or NAPF competitions, there’s a very high probability that the lifts were legitimate and executed according to the standards.

A common theme amongst coaches and competitors of my ilk is credibility. We want our lifts to actually mean something. Abiding by the rules and the standards of the organization lends itself to personal integrity where lifts can be beyond reproach. When one of my lifters achieves a PR, I want it to be an accomplishment they can be proud of and one worthy of praise.

Meanwhile it’s the lifters’ job to perform the lifts according to the rules. In other words, we must meet and uphold the standard. While powerlifting is strenuous and obviously maximal lifts don’t always look like ballet, they should still be clean enough to meet the performance criteria. Taking this a step further… American, national, and world records ought to be performed close to flawlessly. When in doubt, a referee is instructed to give a white light. But when records are on the line, there shouldn’t be any doubt. Lifters work too hard to have their records erased by a bogus lift. That reduces credibility within the organization and causes dissension amongst the rank and file.

My multi-faceted view of the sport has been instrumental in formulating one of my mantras… “Take it out of the referees’ hands.” As lifters we all know the rules in advance and have a decision to make. We can choose to perform the lifts according to the standards or not. With choice comes control. Control breeds power. When a lifter decides to perform the lifts according to the rules, that power becomes emancipating. You no longer feel restrained by a judge who holds the keys to your fate. In essence, you unlock the shackles and create a higher probability of success. Taking it out of the referees’ hands allows you to have the final say. This means squats should be sunk well below parallel, benches should come to a complete stop and be held motionless at the chest, and deadlifts should be locked out convincingly. Don’t confuse my recommendations with the suggestion of squatting so low that your buttocks rest on your calves or ankles. Similarly, benches don’t need to be paused for five seconds nor deadlifts held for twenty. However, we owe it to ourselves to perform to the highest standard. Train the powerlifts often, acquire skill, achieve technical mastery, and then use your mastery to execute with precision thus showing the referees that your lifts are flawless. Don’t leave your lifts to chance. They’re too valuable for that. By allowing the judges to determine your fate, you’re putting yourself at risk and relinquishing your leverage.

When I take the platform, I choose to perform the lifts as perfectly as possible. I’m making the decision easy for the referees. They have no choice but to give a white light for my lifts. If I miss a lift, it’s because I flat-out missed it due to a lack of strength. I can live with not being strong enough on that day. That’s fixable. I can head back into the lab, decipher what needs improvement and work harder. But I refuse to live with failing to comply with the rules. That’s unacceptable and I won’t let it happen.

You only get nine attempts. Each one should be treasured so as not to waste them or miss one for carelessness. Choose your attempts wisely. Apply science and logical thinking to attempt selection. Have a trusted coach in your hip pocket at meets so your adrenaline and ego don’t prevent you from thinking rationally. Make your lifts count. Choose to be the better lifter. Compete with integrity so that when you walk off the platform everyone will know your lifts were indisputable. In the immortal words of my friend and colleague, Dr. Michael Zourdos, “Do your job!”

Tagged with:
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Requisites for Success

Success in athletics is easily quantifiable in a myriad of ways including PRs, scores, and winning. Success is neither an accident nor a coincidence. Achieving success is a process and the direct result of a set course of action. It doesn’t just happen.

Platform_SwedenThe past three months have been some of the most exhilarating of my entire life. In June 2012, I was as an assistant coach on the USA teams at the inaugural IPF Classics Powerlifting World Cup in Stockholm, Sweden (Picture on right: Platform at 2012 IPF Classics World Cup – click for larger view). In essence, this was the first official Super Bowl of raw (unequipped) powerlifting. I can’t recall ever being that excited for a single competition that I wasn’t competing in. The anticipation was overwhelming. The Swedish Powerlifting Federation delivered on their promises. The competition was top-shelf on every level and the entire week exceeded the hype. Collectively the USA men and women’s teams placed second overall. Individually, our lifters performed exceptionally well as many came home with medals and some with world records.

The following month I had the honor and pleasure of presenting at the 2012 Reactive Training Systems (RTS) Powerlifting Seminar in Orlando, Florida (Picture below: RTS Seminar Presenters).

RTS_Seminar_Speakers2

Working alongside powerlifting legends like Suzanne “Sioux-z” Hartwig-Gary as well as some of the brightest coaches, experts, and scholars like Jeremy Hartman, Mike Tuchscherer, and Dr. Michael Zourdos has already proven to be one the highlights of my professional career. I probably learned more about technique, training, and nutrition in two days than I had within the past two years.

Three weeks later all but one of the RTS presenters competed at the 2012 USA Powerlifting Raw Nationals in Kileen, Texas. We were all blessed with outstanding individual performances. Any time four lifters exhibit a 94.4% successful attempt rate including personal records (PR); they’re obviously doing something right.

Our lives are full of chapters. Occasionally, I like to refer to them as seasons. These three impactful life events comprised a season in my life. As seasons conclude, I like to pause and reflect. Meaningful introspection isn’t accomplished in one sitting. In fact, it can take days, weeks, and months, sometimes longer to truly learn and grow from all that’s transpired. Self-analysis often reveals positive and negative elements. When you’re truly honest with yourself, examination can be painful. However, that pain can lead to improvement and progress. Perusing meet results and photographs, watching video highlights, reviewing lecture notes and power points, and simply recalling conversations all contribute to vivid memories that will last a lifetime. I’m so thankful for these moments and never take them for granted.

Success in athletics is easily quantifiable in a myriad of ways including PRs, scores, and winning. Success is neither an accident nor a coincidence. Achieving success is a process and the direct result of a set course of action. It doesn’t just happen.

LannyBassham1975

One of my star lifters recently gave me a most wonderful book entitled “With Winning in Mind,” by Lanny Bassham. Lanny (pictured on right at 1975 Pan American Games) was an awkward kid growing up. He never excelled in athletics but years later, he finally found his niche’ in competitive rifle shooting and went on to win the Olympic gold medal at the 1976 Olympics in Montreal, Canada. Two years later he won the world championships in Seoul, Korea. In doing so, Lanny developed his trademarked Mental Management System that helps competitors create a process for increasing the probability of success. While some of the information is both common sense and familiar, it’s definitely worth reviewing. His other ideas and many of the nuances of his methods are creative, fresh, and thoughtful. I have begun employing some of them in my own life and am thankful for the positive mindset they help create. His text should be required reading for every competitive athlete.

One of the best things about powerlifting is its objectivity. Performances and results aren’t influenced by personal feelings or opinions. Success as well as winning and losing are all based on actual fact and concrete data. It’s a reality that provides immediate feedback. Lifters compete within specific weight classes and the one who lifts the most weight wins. It’s simple and so revealing at the same time.

As I outlined in my 2010 piece “Training Specificity for Powerlifters,” athletes of all genres are quick to seek out the latest training methodology. Unfortunately, training protocol isn’t the answer to athletic success. Self-proclaimed gurus, strength coaches, famous powerlifters, and sports performance specialists would all have you believe that their programs are the key to unlocking your potential. Lord knows there are a myriad of methods to choose from including: linear periodization, undulating periodization, 5/3/1, Sheiko, 5×5, the Texas Method, the Bulgarian method, Westside, RTS, Prilepin’s Table, and the list continues. Sadly, athletes are often duped into believing that training protocol matters most. Training plans matter but not nearly as much as consistent effort applied over time. Corrective exercise specialists and physical therapists will brainwash you into thinking you’re better off fixing all your imbalances first before taking another step. If we only followed their counsel, we’d never actually train. At some point, you need to suck it up and get under the bar. Equipment manufacturers will even go so far as to announce that unless you’re training on their equipment or using their facilities, you have no chance.

When examining methodology, it’s easy to find uniqueness and differences. More important are the common themes. What are the best athletes doing? Where are they similar? This is key.

The five speakers at the RTS Powerlifting Seminar presented on a variety of topics from technique and training methodology to nutrition and attempt selection. Looking beyond the power points and the uniqueness of each presentation, one pervading theme resurfaced throughout the weekend. Each expert drove home the mantra of applying consistent effort over time in order to achieve technical mastery.

RTS’s Mike Tuchscherer recently wrote an article entitled “Genetics and Hard Work.” I agree with Mike’s assertions in this article. In fact, his closing remarks about an extreme amount of hard work have inspired me to train harder than before. My own personal reflection has led me to such questions as, “What could I have done differently in my preparations for Raw Nationals? Did I overlook something? What can I do better moving forward? And what’s necessary for me to improve?” Some of that introspection combined with the info from the RTS Seminar have revealed to me that I need to spend more time on the things I’m not good at. It’s no coincidence that those also happen to be many of the areas I dislike. That’s all about to change. I’m embracing those weaknesses and committing to improving them.

While we can all work harder, genetics cannot be overlooked. I won’t use it as an excuse but it’s our reality. My wife Sioux-z stands 4’11” tall and I’d bet my life she would never dunk a basketball on a regulation 10′ basket. That’s not an excuse to put forth less effort. If she were to truly aspire to such an athletic feat of explosive jumping ability, I’d be the first to support her in that endeavor. Thankfully she prefers to spend the bulk of her training time squatting. After all, sometimes your “best” sport picks you. That doesn’t mean you can’t improve or even become world class in an endeavor you aren’t necessarily equipped for. It simply means that if someone with superior genetics follows a similar path, they have a significant head start.

I relish watching experts perform their craft. Experts have the ability to make the extraordinary appear ordinary. It’s like watching an artist paint a masterpiece right before your eyes while only using two colors. Athletics are no different. Supreme athletes are able to do incredible things with their bodies that the rest of us can only imagine. So naturally, every four years I’m drawn to the Olympics. This year was no different as I enjoyed watching the world’s best compete on the world’s grandest stage. I’m particularly fond of the sports I can’t consume on a regular basis – gymnastics and track and field. I find the gymnasts and decathletes to be the world’s best overall athletes because they’re able to do things all the other athletes can’t.

The 2012 Summer Olympics had two instances that really stood out to me. During one NBC telecast, the commentators showed an illustration of Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt’s recent 100m final. Bolt is the current world record holder in both the 100m and 200m races as well as a double Olympic champion. At top speed, his stride measures approximately 10′ in length and he took 41 strides to complete 100m. His next closest competitors were at 44 and 46 strides respectively. In a most basic equation, speed = stride length x stride frequency. Bolt’s competitors have to move their legs much faster to overcome the stride deficit. They could train like animals, become stronger, produce more force than Bolt, and take nearly every performance-enhancing drug in the world, but the probability of overcoming that genetic (stride length) deficit is close to zero. Their flexibility simply can’t be improved to that degree and they can’t trade-in for longer legs. Their only hope is that the Jamaican’s penchant for self-adulation eventually goes to his head and he slacks off in training or underestimates his rivals. However, Bolt has proven he is human in three rare defeats to Tyson Gay, Asafa Powell, and his current training partner Johann Blake.

From what I gather, Bolt works extremely hard at his craft. He deserves credit for working hard. He should thank God and credit his parents for his physical traits. His combination of genetics and hard work are currently insurmountable. While he’s not my cup of tea, there’s no denying he’s the best sprinter of all-time. Naturally, the discussion and media coverage surrounding Bolt’s prowess got me thinking about the role of genetics in sports. Oppositely, a less-publicized Olympic athlete made me consider the role of hard work. NBC painted a poignant picture of Kenyan middle-distance runner David Rudisha. The current world record holder in the 800m, Rudisha lives in Iten, Kenya. His remote village is approximately 200 miles from a rubber track. So, while many of his contemporaries train on rubber tracks and at expensive facilities, he and his coach Colm O’Connell remove large rocks from their makeshift dirt track in what has become an almost daily ritual prior to training.

Coach O’Connell wisely preaches, “It’s not about sophistication. It’s not about facilities. It’s about doing the simple things well and believing in what you do.” Amen to that! Rudisha went on to win the 800m final and set a new world record of 1:40.91. His post-race interview illuminated his humble, soft-spoken demeanor. Without any bombast or show, Rudisha spoke softly revealing his profound conviction in consistent effort and his training methods proving that he doesn’t need modern facilities to become the greatest middle distance runner alive.

oconnellrudisha2

Coach Colm O’Connell with David Rudisha and Rudisha next to his world record time.

It’s glaringly obvious that Rudisha is eternally focused on process rather than outcome. When you constantly dedicate yourself to a series of steps (process) and repeat them over and over again, the results (outcome) take care of themselves. Fortunately for powerlifters, the same holds true. Strength is a skill. Lanny Bassham defines a skill as “doing something consciously long enough for the process to become automated by the Subconscious Mind.” Skill acquisition is best achieved through frequent, repetitious practice. Practicing your skills often and diligently over long periods of time can eventually lead to technical mastery. And while technical mastery is not exactly a destination per se’, it’s a journey that every powerlifter should embark upon. The sooner you hone your skills and step toward technical mastery, the sooner you’ll add a lot of weight to the bar.

In Malcolm Gladwell’s text “Outliers: The Story of Success” he refers to the 10,000-hour rule. His book is based on original research done by Anders Ericsson, a Swedish psychologist who calculated that it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert at something. Using a calculator you can really have some fun with this and notice that even while training 7 days/week for 3 hours at a time it would take close to 10 years to accumulate 10,000 hours of practice. Most trainees don’t have that kind of time and/or aren’t willing to put in that amount of work. Again, this is one person’s research and you can accept it or discard it as you see fit. Perhaps the more appropriate rule for a lifter would be 10,000 high quality repetitions. Suffice it to say, even while some learn faster than others, I think we can all agree that it takes thousands of hours and many years of quality training (practice) to become a master of something. Any way you look at it, the amount of skill you develop is determined by the quality, quantity, and efficiency of your training.

Ultimately, when considering any training strategy, notice the differences but examine the similarities. Parallels typically include a steadfast devotion to the basics and a constant reinforcement of sport form. If you wanted to become a world-class violinist you wouldn’t practice the bass guitar. Sure, both are string instruments but they are quite different. The same holds true for the powerlifts. Some coaches espouse building the lifts rather than training them. Don’t succumb to this lunacy. Training doesn’t need to be fancy in order to be effective. If you want to improve your squat, spend the bulk of your time squatting… just like you do in competition.

Mike Tuchscherer is correct. The one universal commonality of experts and champions is a tremendous amount of hard work. Focus on the controllable. Pay your dues by putting in the time and work. The amount of effort you apply is entirely up to you. Outwork your competitors. At SSPT, we like to refer to it as “sweat equity” and it’s absolutely magical because, as with most things in life, you reap what you sow.

Tagged with:
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Upholding the Standard – Part 1

There’s a definite line representing winning and losing. Accordingly, one’s performance is either above the line (winning performance) or below the line (losing performance). As Coach Tomlin advocates for the standard, he characterizes performances as being above or below that line.

MikeTomlinSince 1969 the Pittsburgh Steelers have had three head coaches. This is fewer than any other team in the NFL during that timeframe. The Steelers pride themselves on consistency and stability. These two constants led them to their current coach, Mike Tomlin.

Players are expected to act and perform according to the Steeler way: aggressive, disciplined, and hard-nosed. These attributes are first instilled in the front office via the Rooney family and trickle down through the remainder of the organization. No matter the perceived importance of the player or position in which he plays, the standard remains the same. When a player goes down to injury or otherwise, the next one steps into the role. The standard remains constant and the replacement player is expected to perform at the same level as the starter. Sometimes these are big shoes to fill. For example, all world and Hall of Fame bound strong safety Troy Polamalu is incomparable. Troy possesses a unique skill set that has never really been seen before. His blend of agility, size, speed, and strength are unparalleled. His style of play includes a reckless abandon and disregard for his body. While his play most often lends itself to superhuman feats, it also makes him susceptible to injury. When Polamalu gets hurt, the second-string strong safety is expected to fill the position until Troy is well enough to return. All the while, the Steelers’ organization and specifically coach Tomlin expect the same level of performance. As “the standard is the standard” maxim is proclaimed with such regularity, the players buy into it and really believe that when their number is called, they too will assume their new role without the team suffering any decrements in performance.

Coaches in any arena are constantly evaluating individuals and teams by their performances. There’s a definite line representing winning and losing. Accordingly, one’s performance is either above the line (winning performance) or below the line (losing performance). As Coach Tomlin advocates for the standard, he characterizes performances as being above or below that line. In all sports, occasionally a winning performance will be below the established standard. The opposite may also be true, especially in team sports, where a losing performance may come because certain members of the team performed poorly while others may have excelled.

In powerlifting, lifters receive nine attempts (three per discipline) to complete their total. The standard level of expectation and performance is six successful attempts. Period. Under no circumstances, short of injury, should a lifter ever make fewer than six attempts. As a result, it’s easy to determine whether a powerlifter’s performance is above or below the line.

Attempt selection is crucial in powerlifting. Powerlifters train hard and compete to determine the strongest person in each weight class. Unfortunately, many coaches and lifters pick an inappropriate attempt, which significantly hampers performance. As outlined in “A Powerlifter’s Guide to Attempt Selection,” (Gary, 2009) there’s a surefire, scientifically based method that may be applied to selecting appropriate attempts.

A lifter’s first attempt (also known as the “opener”) serves to get them into the competition, increase confidence, build momentum, and allows them to take a reasonable second attempt. In essence, the opener is your last warm-up. A foolproof way of determining the first attempt is to use a weight that represents approximately 90-92% (91% on average) of your maximum. Usually, this intensity is a weight you could hit for a triple or at the very least a strong double. The second attempt serves as a stepping-stone and total-building attempt. It should be a weight that helps bridge the gap between a safe opening attempt and hopefully a personal record (PR) attempt on the third. Like the opener, the second attempt should also be a virtual lock. The appropriate intensity for a second attempt is approximately 95-97% (96.5% on average) maximum. When a successful second attempt is achieved, without any significant issues, a PR attempt is warranted on the third. Obviously, this attempt would represent anything over 100% of one’s personal best.

This method ensures a high probability of successful attempts thus increasing a lifter’s total. I’ve used this approach hundreds of times with first-time novices to elite world champions. The success rate is exceptionally high and lifters almost always achieve more than six attempts including some PRs.

Famed Westsider and EliteFTS founder, Dave Tate, espouses a very different approach. In one of Dave’s recent articles entitled, “Why Goals Suck!” he mentions the following: “I’ve always been taught to break my PR by five pounds on my second attempt (in a powerlifting meet you get three attempts), and go for broke on my third.” Upon reading this, I said to myself, “It’s no wonder he rarely made many attempts.” Not only is that a perfect recipe for making fewer lifts, it lends itself to stagnant progress, frustration, and smaller totals. It’s a loser’s approach that goes hand in hand with the mentality of, “If I miss my PR on my second attempt, at least I have a shot at it on my third.” I’ve got news for you. That almost never works. When was the last time you heard of anyone from the EliteFTS, Westside, or any other multi-ply stable for that matter, going 9/9 in a powerlifting competition? Now before you say, “But anyone can go 9/9,” consider going 9/9 while hitting PRs. Is that still considered sandbagging? Making all nine attempts in a powerlifting competition is easy when you’re not pushing yourself to the limit. Anyone can enter a powerlifting competition, lift well under their physical abilities, and walk away with a perfect 9/9 day. On the other hand, it’s extremely difficult to make every attempt when achieving PRs. That’s precisely why the standard is six successful attempts out of nine.

No matter how strong or skilled you are you’re not going to make every third attempt especially when reaching for a PR. Fatigue, mental collapse, breakdowns in form, and misapplied technique are all causes for missed lifts. At times, powerlifting is unpredictable. Therefore, it is imperative that we control our environment as much as possible. Don’t waste time worrying about things beyond your control like climate, the size of the warm-up room, number of lifters in your flight, your competitors, or the judges for your session. Focus on your training in preparation for the competition, dialing-in your equipment, making weight comfortably, attempt selection, and effort. These variables are up to you alone. There are very few sufficient excuses for not controlling the controllable. Rushing through your warm-ups because you weren’t paying attention to the flight schedules is your problem. You should know better than to spend all your time socializing after weigh-ins. Missing an opening bench press attempt because you couldn’t sufficiently touch your chest, in your bench shirt, is your fault. You should have practiced more, learned the groove of your shirt, and memorized the adjustments your handler has to make. Getting buried by your first squat attempt is your predicament. Don’t blame the judges for making you go so deep. They didn’t submit your opener nor were they responsible for you failing to consider the changes your body would undergo by cutting weight.

Six successful attempts out of nine represents a 66.6% success rate. In most schools that would earn you a D on the grading scale from A to F. In powerlifting, six attempts is a satisfactory performance. It’s a solid average or what we like to call an “on-the-line” performance in SSPT-speak. Fewer than six successful attempts is a “below-the-line” performance where beyond six attempts is above the line. Our grading scale makes it easy to measure individual performances.

Consistently making fewer than six attempts is poor lifting no matter how strong you are. Winning your weight class on four attempts doesn’t make you a good lifter. It only means you’re stronger than your competition. Good lifters consistently make most of their attempts. We should all make a high percentage of attempts. Novices should focus primarily on acquiring skill in the competitive lifts via high volume training, gaining valuable platform experience, and constant improvement as reflected by hitting PRs. Intermediate and advanced lifters may possibly add winning to that list. Those competing at the elite level, both nationally and internationally, should aim to place and win if possible. That being said, PRs are the ultimate measure of success. How much fun is winning without making many attempts or hitting any personal bests? Ask any elite champion about a performance where they failed to achieve a personal best or made fewer than six attempts and I guarantee you’ll find a dejected lifter. That being said, following the aforementioned scientific strategy of attempt selection ensures a high probability of more successful attempts. Missing lifts sucks and it’s no fun. More successful attempts are always better. It’s fun making lifts and having fun makes people happy. Competition should be enjoyable. When competing is no longer satisfying, you either need to rethink your approach or find a different avocation.

In 2010, the great Sioux-z Hartwig-Gary competed four times – twice raw and twice equipped. She made 35 of 36 attempts including 7 PRs and 2 Masters World Records. That’s an extraordinary 97.2% success rate. Furthermore, her feats of strength were performed at the highest levels of our sport nationally and internationally with her lone miss coming on her final PR deadlift attempt in Potchefstroom, South Africa.

Siouxz2012

Circumstances can be individual. No matter the result, own your performance and take responsibility for your actions. We all have different standards that we live by. Maintain yours and do the very best you can. That’s all anyone can ever expect.

Tagged with:
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

A Gym Rat’s Guide to the One-Rep Max

1repmaxthumbShow me a person who doesn’t want to be strong and I’ll show you someone who doesn’t get off the couch very often. The ability to move heavy objects and perform physically demanding tasks is just plain cool. When you’re strong, you don’t have to walk around thumping your chest like an idiot, people will stand up and take notice.

Since most of us don’t go around lifting cars or chopping down trees with our bare hands, the easiest place for us to demonstrate strength is in the weight room. Gyms become our stage where we act out our physical abilities.

And the greatest act of all is the one-rep max.

Once reserved for powerlifters, Olympic weightlifters, and dumbbass kids who wanted to show off for their friends, now trainees from all backgrounds can benefit from knowing their 1RM. Athletes and gym rats alike can test their 1RM and then program their training accordingly to meet specific goals.

But why is it important? How do we test it? Most importantly, what the hell do we do with that knowledge?

The One-Rep Max (1RM)

Just what the heck is it?

The 1RM measures the amount of force your muscles can produce in a singular maximal effort. Some folks are better suited physically for the 1RM than others. This typically has to do with genetics because every body has a certain blend of muscle fiber types, unique bone lengths, and muscle attachments. Those having a preponderance of Type II (fast-twitch) muscle fibers, shorter limbs, and lower muscle attachments are better prepared to lift heavy weights.

If you’re not blessed with any of those attributes, the hurdles on your track to strength gains may be a little higher. However, there is good news: anyone can become stronger by putting forth consistent effort.

Why do I need to know my 1RM?

The 1RM is vital for continued success in the gym because it’s real and concrete. It’s not hypothetical or assumed. Once you know your 1RM, you’ll have a better idea of where you stack up against your peers. Your 1RM lets you know exactly where you stand at any specific moment in time. With your known 1RM, you can set goals, chart a course of action, and test yourself again in hopes of setting a new personal record (PR). After all, the PR is what we’re all aiming for.

So, we’re gonna do curls, right?

Nope. Big, compound, free-weight barbell movements are the ones we want to test. We’re talking about the squat, bench press, deadlift, power clean, overhead press, and all of the variations thereof. In other words, you might also want to test your 1RM in the front squat, box squat, board press, or rack deadlift, but don’t bother testing your 1RM in dumbbell exercises or movements like step-ups, lunges, 1-arm dumbbell rows, or triceps extensions because you’ll most likely hurt yourself (and look stupid in the process).

Who should test for a 1RM?

Novice trainees with fewer than two years of training experience should not test their 1RMs; these folks need to focus on learning proper exercise form and developing their technique according to their individual body structures. Additionally, if you’re new to the iron game, you’ve got plenty of time to improve and your newbie gains will come so fast that your maxes will change every week.

Intermediate lifters with more than two years of training under their belts can begin thinking about testing their 1RM. Advanced lifters should already know their maxes (if you don’t, just what the heck are you waiting for?!)

Your current state of preparedness will let you know if you’re ready to test a 1RM or not. In other words, if you’ve taken a break from training or have spent most of your time handling weights in the 8–15 reps range, you’re not prepared. If you typically train big compound lifts in the 5-8 rep range, then you’re getting closer.

The Psychology of the 1RM

When you hit a heavy single, it’s a different ballgame. Not only is your mental state different, but the way you approach this event physically will be different as well. Imagine yourself getting under a bar loaded with 135 pounds and having to squat it 10 times. You’re probably saying to yourself, “Well, this is just a warm-up set, so let me bang these out and work up to my heavier sets.”

Now imagine loading the same bar with 500 pounds and see what’s running through your mind!

Heavy singles require a unique mental approach in that they require increased attention, mental focus, intensity, and muscle recruitment. When you approach a max lift, you’d better be incredibly focused. If not, you’re setting yourself up for some big hurt.

Visualization before a max lift helps focus the mind on the task at hand. Repeating positive mental cues like “hips back, knees out, and chest up” can breed confidence. Music is a great motivator. This is the time to crank up the iPod with your favorite training song and get pissed off.

(Side note: My good friend and former training partner, six-time IPF World Powerlifting Champion “Captain” Kirk Karwoksi, used to listen to AC/DC’s Back in Black while remembering the douchebag who cut him off in traffic earlier that day. By the time he approached a max attempt, he was like a caged animal. His rage-induced frenzy transformed him into a ticking time bomb just waiting to explode into the bar.)

1repmax_1

Raw Powerlifter Ryan Celli understands the mindset required for hitting a heavy single

(Photo courtesy of Celli’s Fitness Center)

Training for the Max Attempt

If you’ve never tested your 1RM, or if it’s been a while since you’ve trained heavy, set aside at least a month to begin working up to heavy singles. Start hitting sets of five for a week or two, then drop to three reps for two weeks, then hit some singles the last two weeks. This doesn’t mean you’ll go to failure on each set. If your normal bench workout has been 225 pounds for 3 sets of 10 reps, then it’s time to start adding weight. In your next workout, try something like this:

[sets x reps]
•Bar x 10
•135 x 8
•185 x 4
•225 x 2
•235 x 5
•245 x 5
•255 x 5

This approach will start bringing your body (and more importantly, your central nervous system or CNS) up to speed for heavy singles. Maybe your next session can include more triples, such as:
•Bar x 10
•135 x 8
•185 x 4
•235 x 3
•250 x 3
•260 x 3
•270 x 3

The key on your warm-up sets is to prepare your body, CNS, and mind for the heavier weights. Don’t bother with more than five reps per set unless it’s an early warm-up set. Performing lots of reps on your warm-up sets will only fatigue you and take away from your heavier work sets. Remember that you’re training for “Go!” and not just for show.

A third week might follow this progression:
•Bar x 10
•135 x 8
•185 x 4
•235 x 3
•255 x 3
•265 x 3
•275 x 3

And a fourth week might look like this:
•Bar x 10
•135 x 8
•185 x 4
•235 x 2
•255 x 2
•275 x 2
•285 x 1
•295 x 1

Don’t be afraid to use the little plates when working your way up. If all you ever add is large plates, your progress will stall. It doesn’t make you any less of a badass to use the 10s, 5s, and 2.5s. At our training facility we’ve got .25kg plates for those times when all that’s needed is one more pound for a huge lift. Trust me, sometimes a few pounds is all you’ve got, and it’s better to increase by that couple of pounds and keep making progress than to always jump big and miss.

Time to Test!

After a couple of weeks of heavy singles, it’s time to test your 1RM. Get a good night’s sleep the night before, make sure you’re well fed, and remove as much stress from your life as possible. When you get to the gym, warm up for a few minutes, do some dynamic mobility movements relevant to the lift you’re testing, put your mind in the right place, and get after it.

If you’re testing your squat or bench press, make sure you have competent spotters. Warm up just enough to prepare your body for your heavier attempts.

Here’s a progression based on the previous examples:
•Bar x 10
•135 x 5
•185 x 3
•225 x 2
•255 x 1
•280 x 1
•Test!

After you make your initial attempt, assess how you feel and increase accordingly. Be true to yourself. If possible, take video of your max lifts. Not only can video highlight breakdowns in form, but sometimes can show that perception and reality are two totally different things. Any weight over 90 percent of your max is likely to feel heavy. However, sometimes you’ll watch the video and realize that your bar speed was lightning fast. If your initial testing weight feels good, add 5-10 pounds. Keep going until one of three things happens: you miss a weight, you grind it out and realize there’s nothing left in the tank, or your form becomes so much of a train wreck that continuing presents a health risk.

1repmax_2

A competent spotter is a MUST for testing your 1 Rep Max

After the 1RM Test

Once you have your 1RM, take a moment to bask in the glory of your efforts. After you come back down to earth, grab a calendar, put pen to paper, and plan your next training cycle. The first step is setting realistic goals.

If you just squatted 475 pounds for the first time, it’s very tempting to set a goal of 500-pounds as the next “big” number. However, you’ll want to consider the timeframe for when you plan to achieve that goal. If you only give yourself four weeks, don’t expect a 25-pound increase. You’d be better off settling for 480 pounds or perhaps a little more.

I’m not suggesting that you always sandbag your efforts. I just know that small, incremental, and steady progress is superior over the long haul. When you’re feeling energetic and strong on a test day, then ride the wave and push yourself to the limit because you never know when that wave will come around again. Otherwise, be happy with achieving the next five pounds. A PR is a PR no matter how large or small.

Periodizing Your 1RM

Some form of periodization usually works best when training to improve your 1RM. Resist the urge to retest your lifts the following week. Unless you have some heavenly revelation from above, your lifts won’t improve that quickly. Trust me, you’ll want to devote at least a good 8-12 weeks to hard training before you test again.

In fact, many seasoned, competitive powerlifters only compete two to three times a year. Take a page from that book and pick two to three dates per year when you plan to reassess your 1RMs. Once you select your dates, count back to the current date. Now you have the number of weeks you have to work with.

Mapping out an annual training plan is indicative of a trainee who is transitioning into a different stage of his or her lifting career. Intermediate and advanced trainees are wise to create a roadmap toward a goal. A training plan serves as a blueprint or an outline but is not a contract. It gives you the flexibility to adjust on the fly and make changes when necessary.

A Few Resources to Check Out

The best way to improve your 1RM is to train with percentages of your max because they provide the ability to train within specific intensity ranges. You don’t have to look very far on the internet to find that there are a myriad of templates to choose from. You can choose something as basic and linear as Bill Starr’s classic 5 x 5 system, Jim Wendler’s 5/3/1 Method, Westside, Boris Sheiko’s system, the Bulgarian system, or use one of my personal favorites, Prilepin’s Table.

Regardless of which path you head down, recognize that strength is a journey and not a destination. You can always add one more pound to the bar. The 1RM affords you the opportunity to approach your training in a more calculated and focused manner with a real target in your sights: your new PR!

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Training Specificity for Powerlifters

RoadMapToPRNavigating the tortuous road to athletic achievement requires a comprehensive roadmap. Motivated trainees are constantly searching for the latest protocol that will transport their performance to the next level. They will scour the Internet for the most recent training methodology. Athletes will dive into the pool of printed media including articles, journals, periodicals, and texts in an effort to find the missing link that will take them from novice to elite. Some will even travel cross-country to attend seminars, taught by experts, in their respective endeavor. These options require one to use much of their disposable time. In an age where time is such a rare and precious commodity, trainees often waste their time by looking in the wrong places for answers to the physical achievement riddle.

When you aren’t reaching your goals, there are not an infinite number of places to look for the answer. For athletes, the answer usually falls into one of the following general categories: nutrition, recovery, or training. Within each of those categories lie many subcategories. For example, within the nutritional category there are pre-training meals, post-training meals, supplementation, fluid intake, as well as health-related issues such as allergies and diabetes. If we’re examining recovery, we need to consider rest between training sessions, time between competitions, sleep patterns, attention to injuries, prehabilitative modalities, and the list goes on. Within the training arena there are many variables such as exercise selection, intensity, rest periods, technical ability, proper planning, and volume. Within each of those variables lies even more division. All of these ‘places’ to look for your answer can become both confusing and frustrating. Sometimes it feels like we’re looking for a needle in a haystack.

With so many areas to examine, some people overanalyze every aspect of their lives while others stop looking altogether. I’ve certainly been guilty of overanalyzing my own training. Sometimes breaking down every aspect of your pursuit is the answer. Other times the answer might be right in front of you. My best advice is to first scrutinize an area that most forget to consider. Start at square one. Square one is technique. Technique is the foundation of any athletic endeavor. It doesn’t matter if you’re teeing off in a golf tournament, serving a tennis ball, shooting a free throw, squatting 500-pounds, or hurling a javelin – your technique is the single most important aspect of your journey. The good news is that technical mastery is something you have complete control over. While it’s true that some athletes have amazing success with poor technique, they are the exception rather than the rule. You can have all the ability in the world but if you fail to hone your skills, eventually it will show.

Form and technique are terms often used interchangeably. In reality, they mean different things. Form refers to an accepted procedure or set of steps to perform a skill. In the powerlifting squat, it’s common knowledge to break at the hips first, sit back with an arched torso, descend, open your groin by pushing your knees outward, hold your chest up, and keep your abdominals tight by pushing them out. These are some of the key points to remember while descending into a full squat. Regardless of your respective sport, these steps should be followed when performing a power squat. Technique, on the other hand, refers to one’s own approach to those procedures. In other words, it’s your own “artistic stamp” on the performance of a skill. Again, using squatting as an example, we see wide-stance squatters like Eric Kupperstein (immediately below) and then lifters that employ a narrower stance like Kirk Karwoski (below Eric’s photo). Both men have the ability to squat ponderous poundage yet they go about it quite differently. They have crafted their technique during years of training (practice) via thousands of reps and each lifter has created a process that works best for them.

EricKsquat_520px_400px

KirkKSQ903_520px_400px
Eric Kupperstein and Captain Kirk Karwoski both get the job done. They just go about it differently.

Genetics play a huge role in technique. You are not likely to see tall powerlifters squatting with an extremely narrow stance. Typically they’ll squat with a wider stance. Technique can vary based upon gender, genetics, and sometimes you’ll see regional differences as well. Many women use a sumo deadlift stance as it suits their wider hip structure. Many elite Asian lifters will deadlift using ultra-wide sumo stances. Their Russian and Ukrainian counterparts use a more narrow sumo technique.

The best way to perfect your technique and achieve skill mastery is to practice like you play. Appropriate practice methods and specific training are prerequisites for optimizing performance. Optimal results are best achieved through repetitious practice of the necessary skills involved in performing your task. For the competitive powerlifter, this means creating a set-up and execution process for each lift that can be repeated.

Westside Barbell’s Louie Simmons has done a lot for the sport of powerlifting. He has helped revolutionize training methods and the way people examine their training. His contributions to the sport and willingness to help others are laudable. I’ve spoken to Louie a few times, over the phone, and met him in person in York, PA back in 1998. He was generally affable as we spent most of our conversation discussing training.

Louie has developed a near-perfect training system for geared lifters competing in multi-ply powerlifting federations. Multi-ply federations have different standards of performance for their lifts. While the rules of performance are written the same in their rulebooks, their actions speak louder than their words. Having attended more than my share of multi-ply meets, I have witnessed firsthand the dissimilar standards. This isn’t an attack on those federations. It’s reality. While I vehemently disagree with what they allow and deem acceptable, I’m not using this particular medium of expression to mount a personal attack. Lifters have a choice of where they want to compete and I choose to compete in USA Powerlifting. Almost all of the lifters I coach and consult with also compete in USA Powerlifting or the IPF. Accordingly, most of my teaching is directed at powerlifters competing in similar organizations. That being said, I’m interested in explaining why the methods that Louie has popularized aren’t entirely applicable for raw and/or single-ply lifters competing in the AAU, USA Powerlifting, IPF, 100% Raw, and similar federations.

While strength can be expressed in a myriad of ways, it basically boils down to dynamic strength (speed strength / power), maximal strength (max effort / 1RM), and muscular endurance (repetition method). Westside weaves these three methods into a weekly plan where each method is featured on a different day and special exercises are rotated frequently. While the methods themselves aren’t new, his process of employing special exercises is innovative. Westsiders and their disciples use special exercises such as box squatting, board pressing, floor pressing, Zercher squats, and special deadlifts to develop and peak their strength. Couple these movements with changes in grip width or stance and you have hundreds of variations. You can then take those variations and add bands and/or chains to accommodate resistance and manipulate one’s strength curve. Now you have hundreds more. Different specialty barbells can be used with those exercise modifications. The safety squat bar, cambered bar, trap-bar, and Swiss bar are just a few that come to mind. Now those hundreds of exercises soon mutate into thousands. The Westside system is the epitome of variety. It’s a smorgasbord of training modalities. And while many of these thousands of exercises are useful in strength development, powerlifters should not use them at the exclusion of the competition-style squat, bench press, and deadlift.

Special exercises should be used to address your specific weak points and spend more time under tension in your weakest area. While it’s true that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, if the chain is constructed of poor materials (technique) then it’s going to be weak from the outset. Why bother using fancy bricks, imported wood, tile roof, and platinum fortified nails to build your house if your foundation is poured on sand? Developing, enhancing, and honing one’s technique is a lifelong process. Repetitious technique practice is like pouring a solid foundation of concrete. Executing your technique should become deliberate and so habitual that you almost become robotic. In theory, one should be able to set-up a big squat with their eyes closed. The same is true for nearly any physical skill.

The best way to improve at shooting free throws is to practice shooting free throws. While shooting a jump shot or three-pointer look somewhat similar to a free throw, they’re simply not the same. Would a world-class violinist practice on the bass guitar? While the two are both string instruments, they are quite different. The same can be said for box squatting and squatting. I’ve never seen a box squatting competition, so why make it your staple movement? Box squatting may have a place as an assistance move to correct very specific breakdowns in technique, improve hip mobility, strengthen the hip flexors and posterior chain, and to teach lifters to sit back and stay tight throughout the lift. However, it should never take the place of competition-style squatting through a full range of motion (ROM). Board presses follow the same logic. They resemble a bench press but aren’t the same. Many lifters become world-class board-pressers and then bomb at meets because they’ve never done a full ROM bench press in training. That’s foolish. Again, board presses are a wise choice for increasing one’s lockout abilities but not at the expense of developing proper bench press technique through a complete ROM.

BandsBoardsBoxChains_sm

These tools should never replace the competitive lifts

Spending more time under tension and overloading specific points in one’s ROM via the use of bands and/or chains may be an effective method of bringing up a weak point. However, these modalities stress your central nervous system (CNS) in unique ways and change your technique. Performing a deadlift with chains is not the same as a competition-style deadlift. Accordingly, if your CNS gets used to the motor patterns created by the addition of chains, then the motor pathways of the regular deadlift will be left unattended. As powerlifting is one of the best examples of a “practice-like-you-play” endeavor, I would make competition-style deadlifts the staple movement and use bands or chains as assistance work. Too often, we fall in love with the flavor of the week or the exercise of the month and lose sight of what got us there in the first place. I have always espoused that the Westside system is a more appropriate training method for a non-powerlifting, strength/power athlete than it is for a powerlifter. Most football players want to be bigger, stronger, and faster. Westside will get you there as fast as any system. But what does nearly every champion athlete do when they’re in a slump? They return to the basics and fundamentals. Without mastering the squat, bench press, and deadlift – a powerlifter is nothing. If you want to become a better squatter, you must squat. If you want to improve your bench press, then bench press. And if you want to hit PRs in your deadlift, practice deadlifting.

There’s more than one way to skin a cat and there’s certainly more than one way to get strong. If there were only one way to get strong, we’d all be doing it. Nevertheless, there are smarter ways to train for the raw and single-ply powerlifter. After a dynamic and movement-specific warm-up, most training sessions should begin by performing at least one of the competition movements (squat – bench press – deadlift). Some Russian powerlifting coaches, namely Boris Sheiko, espouse the performance of the main lifts and little else. Sheiko’s templates are traditionally developed for masters of sport. While this method affords the lifter maximum skill acquisition in the competitive lifts, it does little to address individual weaknesses, which may lead to breakdowns in technique. Technical flaws occasionally exist due to a lagging muscle group. Other times, technical issues are simply the result of poor execution like not squeezing your hips at the top of a deadlift.

While Sheiko would have you believe that practicing the squat, bench press, and deadlift ad nauseam is the answer, Westsiders would advise the use of special exercises nearly to the exclusion of the main lifts. Frankly, I don’t think either path is the right one for most lifters. I’ve used similar Sheiko-like periodization templates on myself and with my lifters. Currently, we use Prilepin’s Table, almost exclusively, for regulating volume in the squat and bench press. Additionally, we augment the core lifts with a variety of assistance exercises most often resembling the main lift. Ultimately, we meet somewhere in the middle and I think this is the answer for most.

The bulk of a powerlifter’s training should be devoted to the three competitive power lifts. The key to developing expert technique, according to your body structure, is to build your training volume via the number of sets performed not the number of reps. Performing multiple sets of low repetitions provides maximum skill acquisition through increased practice. For example, the training volume for 10 sets of 3 reps is 30 total reps. Similarly, the training volume for 3 sets of 10 reps is also 30 total reps. However, in the first example, the powerlifter gets 10 opportunities (sets) [the Russians refer to them as “approaches”] to practice their technique. The second example only offers three chances. Three sets of ten reps are more appropriate for a bodybuilder pursuing muscle hypertrophy.

Assistance exercises should be specific to the power lifts in two ways – the muscles utilized and your own weaknesses. Assistance moves should be carefully selected to suit your needs, not those of your training partner(s). If you’re weak during the lockout portion of the bench press and your training partner is slow off the chest, you may want to add some lockout work in the rack or with boards. Your training partner may opt for extra-long pauses at the chest.
Above all else, examine your technique first. If possible, videotape your lifts so you can go back and watch how your body moves under a load. Take videos while training at different intensities. Your technique shouldn’t break while lifting 50% of your max. But when you’re above 90%, there’s a chance things can change for the worse. We pour the bulk of our training foundation using weights in the 80-89% intensity range. Our goal is to become highly proficient with moderately heavy weights so we don’t overtrain the CNS yet still train intensely enough to elicit strength gains. The volume of work performed in this range translates directly to enhanced technique with heavier lifts in the gym and on the platform.

While there are many variables beyond a powerlifter’s grasp, there are a few that you have direct control over. You have entire command over your own training. That’s a huge amount of responsibility. Be wise with your time and practice exactly as you play. In the immortal words of a famed Russian powerlifting coach, “If you want to squat more, you must squat more.” Sometimes the simplest approach is the correct one. Strength is a skill and skills are perfected through plenty of practice. Master your technique in the competitive lifts and watch your total increase.

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

A Powerlifter’s Guide to Attempt Selection

Selecting appropriate attempts, at powerlifting competitions, is a lost art. Too often, lifters fail to reap the rewards of a long training cycle because they select poor attempts.

“Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing.” – Henry Russell Sanders, UCLA head football coach, 1956.  This famous quote epitomizes the competitive spirit that permeates sports in our society. While this attitude is entirely appropriate in many sports arenas, it doesn’t make much sense in powerlifting. Powerlifting measures physical strength and while competitors typically compete in weight classes against others, their primary goal should be to exceed their previous efforts. Unless you’re competing at the highest levels, winning should be of secondary importance. Accordingly, Grantland Rice’s famous quote, “ . . .it’s not that you won or lost, but how you played the game,” would be more germane to a powerlifter’s quest.

Some might argue that this is a losing mentality. If it’s a loser’s mentality, then I’d like to hear from all the lifters who often win but rarely hit personal records (PRs). I doubt they’re very content with their performance. Success in powerlifting is measured by PRs. The key to hitting PRs is making attempts. Awards, championships, and titles are all nice but they’re rather meaningless if you’re not improving. I have always maintained that I would rather place last, while hitting PRs, than win a competition on a bad day.

I regularly peruse meet results, from every level of competition, and I’m astonished by how many attempts are unsuccessful. I’m aware how difficult it is to push our physical limits beyond what normal folks find plausible. That being said, powerlifters of all levels should make the majority of the lifts they attempt. I am not impressed by the lifters who attempt the heaviest poundage. Instead I’m inspired by those that are actually successful in breaking new boundaries by setting PRs and making most of their attempts. Opening with 750 pounds in the bench press and missing it three times is not nearly as remarkable as the lifter who opens with 452 pounds and after three successful attempts finishes with 496 pounds. That’s the difference between good lifting and bad lifting. Just because you possess prodigious strength doesn’t mean you’re automatically a good lifter. Good lifters make most of their attempts. Some of the strongest people I know are horrible lifters. On the other hand, lifters with much less strength are sometimes the best lifters. Being known as a great attempter is not a title one should strive for. The name of the game in powerlifting is making lifts and hitting PRs. Period.

Selecting appropriate attempts, at powerlifting competitions, is a lost art. Too often, lifters fail to reap the rewards of a long training cycle because they select poor attempts. Powerlifting isn’t like golf. In golf, you can shoot a bad round, then go out the following day and get the sour taste out of your mouth by shooting a low score. In powerlifting, it takes months to prepare for one day. And once that day arrives, you only have nine chances to harvest the fruits of your labor. After that moment, it’s back to the drawing board where we have to analyze what worked, what didn’t, and hopefully we’re able to formulate a successful plan for our next competition. Do not make the mistake of missing an opportunity to display your strength and enhance your total by making poor attempt selections.

BradSiouxz_sm3

Brad Gillingham and Sioux-z Hartwig-Gary are two prime examples of lifters who make wise attempt selections.

Selecting appropriate attempts accomplishes three goals. It enables you to progress from one attempt to the next without shocking the body and central nervous system (CNS). It affords you the opportunity to build a respectable total and creates the potential to achieve a PR.

The only attempts that matter are the ones you make. Nobody cares about your opening attempt. That’s worth repeating. Nobody cares about your opening attempt. I grow tired of hearing and reading about lifters who open with outlandish numbers. Opening too heavy does little more than initially impress the audience. So, if impressing audiences is your primary objective, then stop reading now and I wish you the best of luck. For those of you that don’t want to look like an inexperienced fool, follow me and I’ll illuminate a smarter path to hoisting your heaviest weights.

Prior to your competition, prepare an outline of tentative attempts. Have light, medium, and heavy options for your second and third attempts. If your warm-ups don’t go as planned, lower your opener. It’s better to get in the meet and take a slightly larger jump to your second attempt than it is to bomb out completely because you were so fixated on a particular opener.

1st Attempt – “The Opener”

The first attempt (opener) is the most important attempt of the three because it’s first. Your first squat is like making that first hit in a football game. It sets the tone for the entire competition. If your opener is too heavy, doesn’t go as planned, or you simply miss it, the odds are much greater that you will miss your second attempt. In fact, if we compiled statistics on lifters who miss their openers, I’d bet the farm that most of them also miss their second attempt. This is especially true when the opening attempt is too heavy.

Unless you’re a freak like Eddy Coan, you won’t be winning any competitions with your openers. If you open too heavy, not only won’t you win, but you’ll rarely have the opportunity to make it to your heavier attempts. Your best bet is to check your ego at the door, open lighter, and build some confidence. The key to building a nice total is making lifts. The more attempts you make, the more likely you are to achieve a personal best.

The primary purpose of your opener is to get you in the meet. Three failed attempts, in any one discipline, results in a “bomb out” and that represents the worst scenario for a powerlifter. Secondly, the first attempt sets you up for a successful second attempt. An easy opener also has a snowball effect and will build tremendous confidence going into your second.

The best way to select an appropriate opening attempt is to treat it like your last warm-up set. If you do this, you will rarely miss it and often be heading into your second attempt, on a positive note, with confidence. In the mid-1990s, when I trained at Maryland Athletic Club alongside powerlifting legends Kirk Karwoski and Sioux-z Hartwig, the rule was: open with your best triple. Whatever weight you could successfully hit for three solid reps was a safe opening attempt. For first-timers, we periodically subtracted 20 pounds from that number. More experienced lifters could open with their best double but that still wasn’t as surefire as your best triple.

While there are no steadfast rules for selecting opening attempts, now we typically plan in terms of percentages. With respect to attempt selection, I coach all my lifters the same way. Your opener should usually be between 90-92% of your one-rep max (competition PR). Tod Miller, the powerlifting coach at Plainwell High School in Michigan, insists that all his lifters open between 85-88% of their best. While I think this is a little on the light side, I can’t argue with his results. I have never seen one of his lifters miss an opener due to a lack of strength. Personally, I’ve never opened heavier than 93% of my best. People often forget that anything above 90% is considered heavy and when lifting heavy loads, there is much less room for error. Your technique needs to be sound enough to maintain the integrity of your form throughout the lift. Once you get above that 92-93% range, you’re skating on thin ice.

As an example, if we use a lifter with a 523-pound (237.5kg) personal best squat, we’re looking at an opener between 470-480 pounds (approximately 90-92% of max). Assuming training went well, then I would have him open at 474 pounds (215kg). Most lifters with a 523-pound max can likely triple or at least double 474 pounds, possibly more. This confirms the “best triple” rule. In essence, the opener should be easy enough that you can make the lift on your worst day or if something goes wrong.

The best laid plans often go awry on meet day. You can’t control the timing of flights, the general flow of the competition, the strictness of the judging, loading errors, etc. Consequently, the opener should be something you can hit even when the world around you is imploding. Case and point, in 2006 when I squatted my all-time PR of 584 pounds (265kg), I was wrapped too long before my opening attempt. It wasn’t my handler’s fault. Unfortunately, there were no 25kg plates and the spotter-loaders had to switch from the 20kg plates to 50kg plates. Fifty kilogram plates are huge and cumbersome. Consequently, the weight change took longer than anticipated and I was standing in my wraps for an extra minute prior to my attempt. My experience prevailed and I remained calm – closing my eyes and visualizing a perfect lift. Fortunately my 529-pound opening attempt was light enough and I smoked it. If you do the math, 529 pounds works out to 91.3% of 579 (my previous PR). Not only did I walk off the platform ready for a strong second attempt but I was supremely confident knowing that I just crushed 91% of my max under poor conditions.

Lifters using supportive equipment need to be even more careful selecting their openers. They are confronted with the issue of opening light enough to get in the meet and build confidence versus selecting weights heavy enough to allow them to achieve proper depth in the squat or touch their chest in the bench press. The modern day bench shirts change the rules of training. However, they should not change how you approach your opening attempt. Even if it means opening in a looser shirt and then switching into a tighter one, there’s no excuse to not touch your chest with an opener. How much weight it takes to touch your chest, the groove of your shirt, etc., should all be determined beforehand in training. Do not leave this to chance on meet day. You must account for last-minute bodyweight changes and the way your gear will fit. The same goes for your squat suit and knee wraps. There is no excuse for not being able to achieve proper depth with your opening attempt. The opener should be as automatic as any attempt you’ll ever take. This is crucial in the deadlift where as the day wears on, your energy reserves become depleted. Therefore, it’s a good idea to make your opening deadlift attempt one of the easiest lifts of the day. We’ll often open right around 90% and sometimes even a pinch lighter to ensure that we stay alive and register a total. If you’ve set a record in either the squat or bench press, it’s always a smart idea to open light in the deadlift to make sure your record counts.

In the event that you miss your opener – repeat it. That’s right, take it again. One of the most common mistakes in attempt selection is increasing the weight after a missed attempt. The instances in which this should be done are extremely rare. It’s one thing if you beat a “rack” command or take an extra step because the weight was so easy. Even then, I’m an advocate of repeating the opening attempt. The probability of making a successful second attempt after a failed first attempt is very slim. Some coaches increase their lifters’ second attempts if they weren’t able to get deep enough or touch their chest in the bench press. Again I implore you to get those issues resolved prior to competition. Unless I’m dealing with an advanced lifter with many years of competition experience, I would never advocate increasing the weight after a failed attempt. I especially wouldn’t allow it if the lifter missed the attempt as the result of a strength issue. What on earth makes you think you’ll magically have enough strength, on the second attempt, to lift more weight than you missed on the first one?

A missed opener immediately puts you in a deficit below what you had planned and hurts your psyche. A positive attitude means everything in the world of physical achievement and powerlifting is no different. A missed opener puts you behind the eightball and places unnecessary stress on yourself. Now there’s increased pressure to go out and make the second attempt. That pressure increases with every missed attempt.

Over the past few years, I have watched a local competitor bomb out of six competitions. That’s right. He’s made zero of 18 bench press attempts. But he’s the king of the warm-up room. He struts around at only 165 pounds bodyweight and benches nearly 450 pounds off of boards. Wonderful. Then he goes out on the platform and either can’t touch his chest with his opener or gets stapled. With each attempt, you can see his energy draining and his attitude fade. I have always wanted to say something to him but he knows more than me. After all, he board presses in the mid-400s in the warm-up room. Is this guy strong? Maybe. I guess we’ll never truly know until he makes an attempt. Is he a good lifter? Absolutely not. Missing lots of attempts, regardless of how much weight is on the bar, is not good lifting. Do not be the fool who falls into the trap of opening the heaviest. The last attempt you make is the one that counts toward your total.

If you always remember to treat your opener like it’s your last warm-up, you’ll make it with room to spare and point yourself in the right direction on the road to success. Then once you have crushed your opening attempt, you can rest easily that you’re in the meet. Now you’re feeling confident and ready for a solid second attempt that will hopefully set you up nicely for a shot at hitting a PR on your third.

2nd Attempt – “The Stepping Stone”

The second attempt serves as a stepping stone or launch pad to your third attempt. In the event that you miss your third attempt, a solid second attempt also builds your total.

“I’m going for a PR on my second attempt because if I don’t get it, I’ll have another shot at it on my third.”

If I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard a lifter utter those words, I’d be chillin’ on a beach somewhere rather than running my own training center. Going for a PR on your second attempt, with even the suggestion that you might miss it, is a loser’s mentality. The likelihood of hitting a PR on your third attempt after you’ve already missed it on your second is as close to zero as it gets. It almost never happens. Do not venture down the path of stooges. I used to apply the same illogical methods to my madness. I would open too heavy and then jump to a PR attempt on my second. Then I started wondering why I was only making an average of four to five attempts per meet. It soon became glaringly obvious that my body and CNS weren’t ready for the shock of a big second attempt. It wasn’t until I began using my second attempt as a “stepping stone” to my third attempt that I resumed hitting PRs.

Again, while there’s no fixed rule for second attempts, it’s still a good idea to think in terms of percentages. Subsequently, the second attempt is typically somewhere between 95-97% and no higher than 98% of your max. If we refer back to our 523-pound squatter who opened with 474 (90.6%), an appropriate second attempt would be 507 pounds or 96.9% of his max. That would represent a 33-pound (15kg) jump from the opener to the second attempt. This is both safe and very effective. Taking anything larger than a 33-pound increase would likely be too much of a shock to the CNS. While the lifter may in fact be strong enough to lift more weight, the body needs to gradually acclimate to the heavier weights especially when you’re operating at near-maximum intensities.

Always make weight increases incrementally smaller. In other words, if you take a 33-pound (15kg) increase from your opening attempt to your second, do not take a larger increase of 44 pounds (20kg) from your second to your third. The rare instance when this would be applicable is if you’re trying to catch a competitor in the deadlift.

Heavier and stronger lifters will be able to make larger jumps from their opening attempts to their second attempts. It’s nothing for Wade Hooper to jump 44-55 pounds (20-25kg) from his opening squat to his second attempt. As Wade is an accomplished pro and an 800-plus pound squatter, that’s entirely appropriate. However, if we take a closer look, a 20-25kg jump for Wade still represents about a 5% increase from opening to second attempts. Until you’re squatting or deadlifting 750 pounds or more, I’d encourage you to limit your jumps to no more than 38 pounds (17.5kg) between first and second attempts. Fifteen kilos is usually a befitting increase in the squat and/or deadlift for lifters with maxes between 500-750 pounds. For many females and lighter lifters, 22 pounds (10kg) and sometimes 27 pounds (12.5kg) is often a perfect jump from an opener to a second attempt. Weight increases in the bench press are obviously smaller as most of us lift less weight. However, when you run the numbers, you’ll find the percentages are essentially the same. A 300-pound bench presser would be wise to open between 270-275 pounds and take 285-290 on a second attempt. That would set them up nicely for a PR on a third attempt of 303-308 pounds.

A solid second attempt prepares your CNS for a heavier third attempt, builds confidence, and adds to your total. Aiming for a PR on the second attempt is risky business and should only be done by very experienced lifters who recognize that they don’t have enough energy left for a big third attempt. In that rare case, expert lifters will occasionally pass on their second attempt thereby saving energy for a big third. Tony Harris, one of the world’s supreme deadlifters, is known for this strategy. He often opens light, surveys his competition, and saves himself for a big third deadlift. Tony is a cagey veteran who trusts his gut instinct. He always knows exactly how much he has left in the tank. For the rest of us mere mortals, be wise and take a solid second attempt that puts you in a nice position for a PR on your final attempt.

2008_2009_Arnolds

In 2008 and 2009, the teams that made the most attempts have won at the Arnold Sports Festival.

3rd Attempt – “Hit a PR! or Add to Your Total”

The third and final attempt is your last chance to add to your total. It’s also the right time to go for a PR.

Assuming your second attempt was solid and you’re confident, then go for the PR! This is the moment we all train for. This is what powerlifting is all about – the next five pounds. All we can ever ask for is an opportunity. Lock n’ load and take your best shot. This is your chance to do something you’ve never done before. Seize the moment and ride the wave because you never know when it might come back again.

Selecting an appropriate third attempt is simple. If you are going for a PR, choose the next five-pound (2.5kg) increment. This is one case where you’re no longer working with percentages. I have never understood why so many people want to take a large weight increase to a huge PR when lifting five pounds more is progress. Taking a shot at a huge PR (more than 10 pounds heavier than your previous best) is occasionally acceptable. If you’ve moved up a weight class, come back from a long layoff or injury, added a new piece of gear, or improved your training methodology, then going for a big PR may be justifiable. Other than that, just be happy with five pounds. This is especially true for intermediate and experienced lifters. We rake and scrape for every pound we can get. Huge gains are common for the novice but once you’ve been around the block a few times, gains come more slowly. Walking away from competitions with four PRs is an anomaly for experienced lifters.

If your second attempt felt heavy or was more difficult than you anticipated, take what’s there – not what you want. Your training could have been on point and your body could be primed for a PR but if your second attempt took seven seconds to complete, there’s a good chance a PR just won’t go. Do not be so stubborn that you lose precious pounds and the chance to build your total. If you’re in a battle with another competitor, take smart attempts to stay ahead, keep pace, or gain ground. At the highest levels of competition, where winning is the primary goal, think in terms of making lifts first. Establishing PRs should be of secondary importance or saved for smaller competitions where you’re already ahead of the pack. Personal best totals are often achieved even when you don’t set PRs in every discipline.

Exceedingly heavy second attempts are also dangerous as they can fatigue you to the extent of missing your third. Not only can a taxing second attempt hurt your chances at making your third, it can also hamper you in the next two events. The next time you’re at a competition, look for lifters that either grind out their second squat attempt and/or completely miss their third. Chances are they’ll only make two deadlifts. Your CNS may not be ready to accommodate 99% of your max on a second attempt. If we look at our lifter who opened with 474 pounds in the squat, imagine if he jumped to 518 pounds (99%). While this is five pounds under a personal best and he may indeed be able to lift 518 pounds, he could run the risk of it taking too much out of him for his third. Some might argue that the difference between 518 pounds and 507 is only 11 pounds (5kg) but when you look in terms of percentages it’s a difference of 2.1% and when you’re operating at intensities above 90%, that’s a substantial amount. I would much rather take my chances with 507 on a second which wouldn’t fatigue me quite as much and put me in a nice position for a PR on the third attempt.

Always play your game and not someone else’s. Do not try to out lift someone whom you know is stronger than you. If your best bench press is 300 pounds and your competitor presses 400, you won’t catch them. Lift within your own capabilities and survey your competition after your opening deadlift. The deadlift is where you can make your move. Lastly, focus your efforts on surpassing your meet PRs. If you’re constantly trying to improve upon gym PRs, your progress in competitions will decline. Ultimately, you will be remembered for what you did on the platform not what you lifted in the gym.

Conclusion

My years of experience assisting and coaching alongside USA Powerlifting President Dr. Larry Maile at the IPF World Championships has been invaluable. I have witnessed firsthand the perils of poor attempt selection. One can learn a tremendous amount simply by remaining silent and watching the best at their craft. When the stakes are high and the difference between snatching gold and finishing fourth is often decided on bodyweight or fewer than 10 kilos, every single attempt is precious. At national and particularly at the world championships, it’s not always the strongest lifter who wins but rather the lifter that makes the most attempts. Being consistent and building your total via eight or nine successful attempts is superb lifting. Don’t get me wrong, anyone can routinely make eight or nine lifts if they’re not pushing themselves or being overly conservative. Oppositely, it takes thought and precision to make that many attempts while forging past previous boundaries.

Lifters who routinely finish competitions with fewer than six successful attempts need to rethink their approach. That’s not good lifting. Good lifters usually make at least six of nine attempts. Setting a PR isn’t always in the cards. All things are never equal and some days are better than others. When you step on the lifting platform, there are many factors you cannot control. However, the weight on the bar is always your decision. Choose wisely.

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles

Periodization and the Annual Training Plan – Part One

goalSerious and quantifiable improvement, in any quest, necessitates specific goals and objectives with imposed deadlines. If you merely want to get stronger this year, then visit your local gym and start working out. But, if you wanted to squat 500 pounds by June 1, then clearly defined and methodical training is essential.

In part one of this article series, I will give a brief historical account of Periodization then define how it applies to training methodology. I will elaborate on the importance of implementing a defined and time-segmented plan into your arsenal. I will also introduce the annual training plan including the different phases that comprise the year. Characteristics of each phase as well as the phase’s time components will be discussed. Lastly, I’ll present some figures illustrating the Periodization of an annual plan.

It has been said, “If you fail to plan, you may as well plan to fail.” Achieving precise goals requires appropriate planning. Proper planning requires a systematic approach of mapping out methods and strategies at suitable time intervals to ensure task completion. In the realm of athletics and sports, planning is germane to preparing for competition and helping athletes achieve high levels of training and performance. Without blueprints or roadmap directing you toward a goal, the probability of successful achievement is dubious. Your plans should not be so rigid and inflexible to the extent of compromising the integrity of the mission. Coaches and athletes need to be able to discern when to back off and when to push one’s limits. The annual plan simply serves as an outline to direct and focus your efforts.

In organized team sports, coaches and trainers are responsible for scheduling training. Athletes must then rely on the coaching expertise of the staff. In sports contested by one person like boxing, golfing, powerlifting, skiing, tennis, track and field, and weightlifting, the coach can confer with the athlete and together they can determine applicable schedules. Sometimes in these sports, especially at the novice to intermediate levels, the athlete coaches themselves and is responsible for the training format. This is when athletes will occasionally utilize an aimless and random approach. One of my training partners has recently had success with an arbitrary approach. He is the exception to the rule. When many of today’s competitions are decided by hundredths of a second, a few pounds, one half inch, or one point, I prefer leaving my fate in the hands of science rather than chance.

All planning begins with a specific objective (what?) and a deadline (when?). Certain sports require different and sometimes unique training objectives. All sports require multilateral physical development, sport specific physical development, technical mastery, psychological preparation, injury prevention, and overall theoretical knowledge. Most sports are contested during a specific season or part of the year. Consequently, organizing the annual training plan into a specific time frame is crucial. Minimalism is the best approach when considering training objectives. Only focus on the objectives related to the sport’s specific tasks. High jumpers need not place cardiorespiratory endurance at the forefront of their efforts. Moreover, a marathoner will never be summoned to clean and jerk their bodyweight. Athletes and coaches alike, mistakenly waste valuable time and energy on acquiring irrelevant skills.

The best method of planning goal-oriented training is via Periodization. “The foundations of modern training organization and Periodization were laid in the Soviet Union at about the time of the Russian revolution.” In 1917, Kotov wrote Olympic Sport which detailed the division of training into specific stages. (1) Modern day strength experts, Rippetoe and Kilgore, note that in 1933 Mark Berry exercised weekly Periodization with bodybuilders and weightlifters. In the 1950s, Hungarian sports scientist Lazlo Nadori created a periodized model for his athletes. Famed Russian weightlifting coach, Leonid Matveyev established his thoughts on Periodization in the 1960s and eventually, in 1971, he published them. Yuri Verkoshansky created his own methodology of conjugated loading. As Matveyev’s adversary, Verkoshanksy publicly stated that the idea of Periodization was garbage. Upon further review of his Special Strength Training: A Practical Manual for Coaches, one can deduce that his thoughts on training were also divided into different stages. Dr. Dietrich Harre, an East German sports scientist, edited Principles of Sports Training in 1982 which is an integration of both Nadori and Matveyev. Tudor O. Bompa, PhD was trained in an East German system and his texts prove to be restated modifications of Harre’s thoughts. (2) In 1963, Bompa was credited with developing the theory of “Periodization of strength” in Romania. Bompa helped the Eastern Bloc countries rise to dominance in the athletic world and has since used his system to train 11 Olympic and world championship medalists and elite athletes. As Bompa states, “Planning is the art of using science to structure a training program.” (3)

Suitably, it can be said that Russia and the Eastern Bloc countries have contributed mightily to the training methods employed by most of today’s athletes and coaches. While the theory of Periodization has only been around for nearly one hundred years, the training concept of Periodization is not a new discovery. Flavius Philostratus (170-245AD), a Greek philosopher and sports enthusiast, documented the use of a simple form of Periodization employed by Greek Olympians. It is also well known that civilizations have been systematically training for military endeavors for thousands of years. “The roots of Periodization can be found in the term ‘period’ as in period of time.” In the area of sports training, Periodization means dividing the yearly training plan into smaller, more manageable training phases. (4)

Once the training objectives and deadlines have been established, it’s time to design the annual plan. Periodization of an annual training plan is marked by three distinct phases: preseason or preparatory, in-season or competitive, and the off-season which is also known as the transitional phase.

The competition calendar dictates formulation of the annual training plan. After a major competition or at the beginning of the calendar year, the athlete or coach marks the dates of competition in the following year. Once those dates are established, training commences with the preparatory phase.

Preparatory Phase: (Preseason)

The preparatory phase is, in many instances, the most important training phase. This is where you build your foundation. Architects and engineers recognize the importance of building a solid base before erecting structures of significant magnitude. They begin by pouring tons of concrete which is then reinforced with steel rods and iron beams. Athletes must follow suit by pouring the bulk of their training volume into this initial phase. Just like tons of concrete, a high training volume is mandatory for adaptation to the imposed stimuli. If inadequacies in training volume exist during this phase, there will be definite, negative, and noticeable consequences during the competitive period.

The three primary objectives of the preparatory phase are as follows:

  1. acquiring and improving general physical training capacity {this is where an athlete’s General Physical Preparedness (GPP) is prioritized
  2. improving the biomotor abilities required by the sport (agility, balance, coordination, endurance, flexibility, mobility, power, speed, strength, etc.)
  3. skill mastery – developing, improving, and perfecting technique

gpp

GPP Tools: attitude needed, work ethic not included

The preparatory phase usually lasts between three and six months depending upon the nature of the sport. Certain team sports might employ shorter preparatory phases but not less than two to three months. “For individual sports, it should be one to two times as long as the competitive phase.” (5) Furthermore, the athlete’s age and sports classification must be considered. The length of the training phase and load characteristics will depend upon the level of the trainee. For simplification, Bompa then divides the preparatory phase into two subphases – general and specific preparation.

The principal objective of the general preparatory subphase is establishing a high level of physical conditioning to promote further training. General physical preparedness (GPP) is emphasized through general exercises as well as those unique to the sport. General exercises need not exactly mimic sport performance unless the sport dictates that rule. Sports like powerlifting and weightlifting are exception to that rule as their training is focused on the exact same tasks that are required during competition. If you take a few months off from squatting or power cleans, don’t expect your technique to look pristine when you resume training. Other sports like basketball, football, hockey, volleyball, and wrestling can take a more generic approach of simply conditioning its athletes to a high level without sacrificing sport technique. In sports like running, rowing, and swimming, where endurance is a necessity, aerobic endurance should be the primary objective of the general preparatory phase. Oppositely, general strength and overall work capacity should be the focus of strength related sports such as gymnastics, football, weightlifting, and wrestling.

The second subphase of the preparatory period is the specific preparatory subphase. Though the training objectives are similar to those of the general subphase, the training becomes more specific and represents a transitional shift toward the competitive season. Training volume is still high but the majority of that volume should be devoted to specific exercises and movements directly related to the sport patterns. At the conclusion of the specific preparatory subphase, training volume is progressively reduced thereby allowing an increase in training intensity. Skill mastery is the focal point of this subphase. Therefore, when the intensity rises, the athlete does not suffer decrements in performance and overall technique.

Competitive Phase: (In-season or Season)

The competitive phase, for most sports, is the actual competitive season. General physical preparation was the basis of the preparatory period and remains the basis of performance.

The primary training objectives of the competitive phase are as follows:

  • perfecting technique to enable performance at the highest level
  • extended improvement of biomotor abilities
  • maintaining GPP

The competitive phase may last as long as four to six months depending on the sport. Team sports require a much longer competitive season than that of a powerlifter, whose competitive phase may be as short as five weeks. Team sports remain focused on skill perfection as they are asked to perform more regularly. Additionally, tactical maneuvers and strategical planning are commonplace during this phase. Conditioning and GPP must be maintained rather than increased. Maintaining GPP decreases the risk of injury to the athlete. Athletes that lose their conditioning level are at an elevated risk of reduced performance and injury. Training volume must be closely monitored so athletes and teams do not suffer lost performance as a result of high volume at heightened intensities. Peaking at just the right moment can be the difference between winning championships and losing seasons. Likewise, the competitive season may be divided into two subphases for organizational means. The precompetitive subphase could feature exhibitions or unofficial competitions that are used for the purpose of a skills evaluation. The main competition subphase would then be applied intently to maximizing one’s potential and facilitating exceptional performance at the main competitions. When multiple competitions are on the schedule, they should be ranked according to importance. Lighter competitions would ideally flow into progressively more challenging tests.

Training intensity should be increased continually until approximately two to three weeks prior to competition. Then the intensity needs to progressively drop in a deload fashion (brief unloading phase) to ensure adequate physical and mental restoration before competing. By tapering training volume and intensity, fatigue and stress can hopefully be eliminated. It is absolutely imperative that the central nervous system (CNS) has sufficient time to recover prior to competition. Systemic fatigue can destroy performance. Allowing the athlete to replenish energy reserves creates the best scenario for optimum performance.

Transitional Phase: (Off-season or Active rest)

Immediately following competitions, long periods of preparation, and hard work, athletes require rest and recovery. Athletes may have high levels of physiological and psychological fatigue. Muscle soreness and fatigue may vanish in a few days but CNS fatigue can remain much longer.

The three principal objectives of the transitional phase are as follows:

  • CNS restoration
  • Analyzing the past training programs and their results
  • Mapping the ensuing annual plan

Bompa believes that the transitional phase is often wrongly named the off-season as the term off-season implies the cessation of all activities and total rest. Sudden interruption of training and passive rest can lead to detraining. Detraining causes the erosion of most gains from the previous training periods. Additionally, completely suspending all activity can lead to other problems including but not limited to headaches, exhaustion, tension, mood disturbances, insomnia, loss of appetite, poor digestion, decreased testosterone levels, diminished motor recruitment patterns which lead to loss of skill, decreases endurance capacity, lost speed, reduction in flexibility, and lowered strength. (6) Many coaches have likened this to mountain climbing. Once you have finished trying to reach the peak, why would you want to walk back down the mountain and start the climb all over again? As a result, Bompa encourages athletes to participate in a transitional phase featuring a time of active rest. Active rest should begin immediately following competition. Training volume and intensity should be gradually reduced. Exercises and different activities should be emphasized over competition tasks. Athletes that compete in water should engage in land activities. On the other hand, swimming can be tremendously therapeutic to athletes like boxers, weightlifters, and wrestlers that compete and train indoors. The only case where total passive rest is admissible is in times of injury. Injuries should be dealt with immediately so the athlete may resume some level of activity as soon as possible. The transitional phase should typically last between three and four weeks but no longer than five weeks. Proper planning of the transitional phase can help ensure that the athlete can begin the new training cycle at a higher level than the preceding year.

Figure 1 below illustrates the Periodization of the annual plan.

period_Fig1
Notice that each training phase is divided into macrocycles. A macrocycle typically represents a period of three to six weeks. One of the easiest ways to schedule an annual plan is to form macrocycles that equate to actual months of the year. Therefore a macrocycle would last four weeks and become very manageable. A microcycle is a smaller unit of time, usually represented by the weekly training program or one week. One individual training session or workout would denote the only cycle or unit of time smaller than the microcycle.

Figures 2 and 3 below represent periodized training plans utilizing a bi-cycle (double peak) and a tri-cycle (triple peak).

period_Fig2

period_Fig3

The more times an athlete is required to peak throughout the year, the more stress an athlete is likely to incur. Consequently, competitions should be prioritized to ensure continued peak performance at the most important times.

Now that Periodization has been defined and the characteristics of the annual plan have been explained, part two of this article series will focus on the three different Periodization groups and their advantages and disadvantages. I will offer preferences and suggestions based upon my own personal powerlifting journey. Part three of the article series will introduce the findings of Alexander Sergeyevitch Prilepin and how they apply to all strength trainees, then deal with specific training volume, suitable intensities, as well as time management and organization. Upon completion of the series, my hope is that athletes and more specifically powerlifters will ultimately be equipped with the necessary knowledge to create a periodized annual plan of their own.

 

References

1. CyberSport Quarterly, Gideon Ariel, November 1996.

2. Practical Programming for Strength Training, Mark Rippetoe and Lon Kilgore, PhD, 2006, pp. 206-207.

3. Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training, Fourth Edition, Tudor O. Bompa, PhD, 1999, p. 150.

4. “Primer on Periodization” Tudor O. Bompa, PhD, June 2004.

5. Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training, Fourth Edition, Tudor O. Bompa, PhD, 1999, p. 216

6. Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training, Fourth Edition, Tudor O. Bompa, PhD, 1999, pp. 224-225

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Matt Gary Articles
Follow USA Powerlifting MARYLAND on WordPress.com
Article Categories
Articles
Website Traffic
  • 777,425 hits